Falter is rated Left-Center with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Falter Left-Center Biased based on its left-liberal positions on social issues, environmental policy, civil liberties, and consistently critical coverage of right-wing populism. We rate it High for factual reporting due to strong investigative standards, transparent ownership, credible sourcing, and a clean fact-check record despite occasional editorial and ethics controversies.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.4)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: Austria
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Falter is an Austrian weekly news and culture magazine founded in Vienna in 1977 by students and artists. It covers Austrian politics, economics, media, culture, the environment, and urban affairs and is particularly known for investigative journalism and long-form political reporting. The publication also operates Falter Radio, newsletters, books, cultural guides, and an extensive digital archive dating to 1999.
Florian Klenk serves as editor-in-chief, while longtime editor Armin Thurnher remains publisher and a prominent columnist. Falter describes its journalism as independent, investigative, analytical, and critical. Its print edition has a weekly circulation of approximately 46,000, while Falter.at records hundreds of thousands of Austrian users each month.
Read our profile on Austria’s government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Falter is published by Falter Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H. and Falter Zeitschriften Gesellschaft m.b.H. Ownership is divided among several private shareholders and foundations. According to European media-ownership records, major interests include Andante Privatstiftung, Ateleia Privatstiftung, Hannes Pflaum, Sophie Piech, and editor-in-chief Florian Klenk.
Revenue comes from print and digital subscriptions, newsstand sales, advertising, sponsored commercial content, events, books, and other publishing activities. Falter publicly identifies its publisher, editorial leadership, business address, advertising operations, and ownership structure.
Analysis / Bias
Falter demonstrates a consistent left-liberal editorial perspective, particularly regarding civil liberties, immigration, environmental policy, social equality, media freedom, and opposition to right-wing populism. Austrian media researchers and media-monitoring organizations commonly describe the publication as left-liberal. However, Falter is not closely aligned with a single political party and regularly investigates or criticizes politicians across Austria’s political spectrum.
Coverage of the right-wing FPÖ is frequently critical and sometimes uses strongly judgmental framing. For example, a 2026 article examining the party’s history described the FPÖ’s presentation of its past under Herbert Kickl as an example of historical revisionism. Falter has also extensively investigated right-wing extremism, COVID-denial movements, nationalist organizations, and relationships between Austrian political figures and authoritarian governments.
At the same time, Falter also interviews and scrutinizes center-right politicians rather than simply excluding their perspectives. In Haben Sie Angst, dass alles eskaliert, Herr Nehammer?, former ÖVP Chancellor Karl Nehammer discusses Russia, the European Union, the FPÖ, and his political career in an extended interview. Falter also critically covers the current ÖVP-SPÖ-NEOS governing coalition, including disputes involving government reform, media policy, taxation, and migration.
Socially, Falter generally favors progressive positions on LGBTQ rights, immigration, environmental protection, gender equality, and social welfare. Its reporting also frequently emphasizes threats to democratic institutions, press freedom, and minority rights. Economically, the publication tends to favor regulated markets and stronger public institutions rather than socialist ownership, placing it more comfortably in the Left-Center category than the Left.
Factual reporting is generally strong. Falter employs named professional journalists, conducts original investigations, publishes interviews and documents, and frequently relies on court records, government documents, leaked communications, academic sources, and direct reporting. In 2026, the Austrian Press Council found that Falter’s presentation of an interview concerning an imminent assisted suicide violated media-ethics standards because it lacked sufficient restraint; however, the ruling focused on presentation and suicide-reporting ethics rather than establishing that the underlying facts were false. In 2025, Falter also acknowledged and apologized after discovering that a freelance contributor had plagiarized substantial portions of an article.
Failed Fact Checks
- None found from major IFCN-approved fact-checking organizations.
- The Austrian Press Council found a 2025 report concerning assisted suicide violated media-ethics standards regarding appropriate restraint; this was not primarily a factual-accuracy ruling.
Overall, we rate Falter Left-Center Biased based on its left-liberal positions on social issues, environmental policy, civil liberties, and consistently critical coverage of right-wing populism. We rate it High for factual reporting due to strong investigative standards, transparent ownership, credible sourcing, and a clean fact-check record despite occasional editorial and ethics controversies. (D. Van Zandt 10/30/2026)
Source: https://www.falter.at/
Last Updated on October 30, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources