Ruptly – Bias and Credibility

Ruptly - Right Center Bias - Conservative - Propaganda - Fake news - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Ruptly Right-Center biased and Questionable due to the promotion of pro-state propaganda that is not always factual.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Propaganda, False Claims
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Russia
Press Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2013, is an international video news agency specializing in video on demand, based in Berlin, Germany. It is a division of the RT (formerly Russia Today) news network. Ruptly claims to be editorially independent; however, its sole shareholder is ANO TV-Novosti, a Russian government-funded non-profit organization that controls RT. According to their about page, “Our mission is to offer a bolder, deeper point-of-view than the established figures of the news marketplace. We offer a forward-thinking vision, news without the blindfold on.” Essentially, Ruptly serves as the video producer for RT News.

Read our profile on Russia’s Government and Media

Funded by / Ownership

Ruptly is owned by ANO TV-Novosti, who owns and controls RT News. The Russian Government funds ANO TV-Novosti. Ruptly generates revenue through subscription fees for video content. In 2018, Ofcom imposed a £200,000 fine on ANO TV Novosti in relation to its service RT for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules and required a summary of our findings to be broadcast on the channel. The report states they were fined for misleading information regarding “the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury on 4 March 2018, the armed conflict in Syria, and the Ukrainian Government’s position on Nazism and its treatment of Roma Gypsies.”

Analysis / Bias

In review, Ruptly produces and sells video content covering the Latest News, Covid-19, Sports, and Light News. Headlines are typically low biased and describe China’s content: Japan’s Abe urges peaceful denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula. Articles provide a video clip to stream and a partial transcript. In order to view the entire transcript, you must pay for a membership.

Editorially, Ruptly promotes pro-Kremlin propaganda that is not always factual. For instance, they reported that the Syrian Chemical attack in 2018 was a false flag operation. However, since that time, they have removed these videos. They have also reported that the MH17 jet shot down in Ukraine was done by the Ukrainians; however, an investigation reveals it was shot down by a Russian missile MH17 investigation says it has evidence for “solid criminal file.” In general, news reporting on Ruptly is significantly controlled by the Russian Government.

Overall, we rate Ruptly Right-Center biased and Questionable due to the promotion of pro-state propaganda that is not always factual. (D. Van Zandt 5/25/2020) Updated (02/25/2022)


Last Updated on June 30, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: