Republican Voters Against Trump (RVAT) - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.

Overall, we rate Republican Voters Against Trump (RVAT) as right-center biased based on its relationship with the Republican party despite its opposition to Donald Trump. We also rate its factual reporting as mixed due to the subjective nature of its homemade testimonial videos and the lack of transparency in funding sources.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Republican Voters Against Trump (RVAT) was initiated in 2020 by Republican political strategist Sarah Longwell to articulate Republicans’ concerns about Donald Trump’s presidency. After 2020, it transitioned to the Republican Accountability PAC, maintaining a distinct website and focusing on holding Republican officials accountable. RVAT, based in Washington, D.C., operates as a project of Defending Democracy Together, a group advocating for change within the Republican Party.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

According to Open Secrets, Republican Voters Against Trump (RVAT) received partial funding during the 2020 election cycle, with specific donors not fully disclosed. Defending Democracy Together may fund RVAT due to operational connections, but confirmed funding details require official statements or specific disclosures. Sarah Longwell and Bill Kristol are among the founders of RVAT, with Longwell serving as a strategic leader.

Analysis / Bias

Republican Voters Against Trump (RVAT) utilizes homemade testimonial videos as a central strategy to influence public opinion against Donald Trump. These videos feature individuals who previously supported Trump but have chosen to withdraw their support, explaining their reasons directly to the camera. For instance, “Mark/Connecticut” states, “Mark/Connecticut. “It is imperative that he is not reelected to president of the United States for the future of our country and the future of our democracy.”

While resonant and impactful in their narrative style, the authenticity of these homemade testimonials poses verification challenges, as they are personal anecdotes without external corroboration. RVAT, led by Sarah Longwell, is creating a coalition based on opposition to Trump rather than support for any opposing candidate, distinguishing RVAT from organizations promoting a specific political agenda or candidate. This strategy aims to resonate with voters disillusioned with Trump but not necessarily aligned with another political figure or party.

The content of these videos focuses on personal experiences and perceptions, which are inherently subjective. While this makes them powerful tools for storytelling and political persuasion, it also means that their factual accuracy is not as easily verified as other forms of political communication that can be cross-referenced with public records or documented events. Furthermore, RVAT’s activities include targeted advertising campaigns such as “New Campaign Highlights Pence’s Refusal to Support Trump, Calls on GOP Voters to Follow Suit,” which specifically targets Republican and conservative-leaning voters in key swing states, emphasizing former Vice President Mike Pence’s stance and urging similar actions from GOP voters, which demonstrates RVAT’s strategic use of targeted ads to reach and influence specific audiences during the election.

In summary, RVAT’s personal testimonials, driven by individual experiences, create a compelling narrative against Trump. However, these accounts’ subjective nature and lack of external validation mean that while they effectively convey personal disillusionment, they are challenging to authenticate against objective standards of factual accuracy.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Republican Voters Against Trump (RVAT) as right-center biased based on its relationship with the Republican party despite its opposition to Donald Trump. We also rate its factual reporting as mixed due to the subjective nature of its homemade testimonial videos and the lack of transparency in funding sources. (M. Huitsing 03/22/2024)

Source: https://rvat.org/

Last Updated on April 3, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check