Notes from Poland – Bias and Credibility

Notes from Poland - Least Biased - CredibleFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate Notes from Poland as least biased due to its neutral tone and focus on evidence-based reporting. The outlet is rated as mostly factual in reporting, with well-sourced information, though it occasionally includes speculative statements and relies on circular referencing.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: Poland
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Notes from Poland is an English-language news website covering developments in Poland. Launched in 2014 by Stanley Bill, a British academic specializing in Polish politics, the platform aims to provide an international audience with comprehensive and accurate reporting on Polish affairs. It covers various topics, including politics, economy, culture, and society, offering insights and analysis from multiple contributors. The chair of the Board is Stanley Bill. 

Read our profile on Polish media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Notes from Poland is published by a non-profit foundation funded through reader subscriptions, donations, and advertising revenue. 

Analysis / Bias

Notes from Poland avoids emotionally loaded language and framing that reflects a particular political leaning. Headlines and articles are typically neutral in tone and content, focusing on factual reporting rather than ideological narratives. However, the outlet’s broader editorial focus on media freedom and governmental accountability can sometimes lead to critical coverage of the Polish government.

For instance, the article titled “US-owned TV station fined in Poland for biased report on Pope’s response to child sex abuse” suggests a focus on the actions of the US-owned TV station and the Polish regulatory response. Notes from Poland’s choice to cover this story align with its focus on significant Polish news with international implications. The story emphasizes the tension between media freedom and regulatory actions in Poland, a recurring theme in the outlet’s coverage. The headline’s relatively neutral wording presents facts without overtly emotive language. The article provides an overview of the situation, including official statements from the National Broadcasting Council (KRRiT) and the involved TV station. The sourcing is balanced, including perspectives from the regulatory body and the TV station. The article does not exhibit a strong political affiliation but maintains a slight leaning toward a critical perspective on Polish authorities’ actions.



Another example is the article “The Renewed Poland-Belarus Border Crisis Explained,” which covers the recent border crisis, providing a factual and comprehensive analysis. It presents a balanced view from Polish, Belarusian, and international perspectives, focusing on a significant geopolitical issue. However, the article mentions the influence of Belarusian and Russian authorities on the migrant influx without direct evidence, making the statement speculative.

It also compares Donald Tusk’s center-right Civic Coalition policies to those of the previous right-wing PiS (Law and Justice) government, presenting a critical view of both administrations.

Additionally, the article cites sources such as the Podlaski Border Guard, reflecting the use of official data to support its narrative. However, circular referencing, where articles reference each other without introducing new information, can be observed, which may impact the depth of the analysis.

Notes from Poland maintain a commitment to neutrality and factual accuracy in their reporting. However, their editorial focus on media freedom and government accountability can lead to critical perspectives on Polish authorities.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Notes from Poland as least biased due to its neutral tone and focus on evidence-based reporting. The outlet is rated as mostly factual in reporting, with well-sourced information, though it occasionally includes speculative statements and relies on circular referencing. (M. Huitsing 06/24/2024)

Source: https://notesfrompoland.com/

Last Updated on June 24, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: