News Addicts – Bias and Credibility

News Addicts - Extreme Right Bias - Propaganda - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate News Addicts as far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, poor sourcing, a lack of transparency, and failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

News Addicts describes itself as a platform catering to readers who are passionate about American politics. It emphasizes patriotism and traditional values. The platform advocates for an America-First agenda, highlighting its support for the U.S. Constitution and conservative principles. 

The website lacks transparency as it does not disclose owners or editors. It provides a P.O. Box in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Information on funding and ownership is not explicitly provided, with revenue generated through display ads and sponsored content.

Analysis / Bias

News Addicts does not produce original reporting, instead summarizing existing news stories from a conservative perspective like this Judge Issues BRUTAL Ruling Against DA Willis. Like many others reviewed, this story does not contain hyperlinked sourcing, resulting in plagiarism. Some stories are properly sourced from credible outlets and poor sources like the Gateway Pundit, which routinely fails fact checks.



Editorially, all stories favor the right and often promote debunked conspiracy theories like this unsourced story: West Virginia Secretary of State Drops a BOMBSHELL: ‘CIA Was Behind the Stolen 2020 Election’. There is no evidence to support a stolen 2020 election. They also frequently promote pseudoscientific disinformation regarding Covid-19 vaccines, as evidenced by failed fact checks below.

In general, News Addicts are far-right biased, and there is evidence provided that they have promoted conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and false claims.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate News Addicts as far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, poor sourcing, a lack of transparency, and failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 03/29/2024)

Source: https://newsaddicts.com/

Last Updated on March 29, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: