Natural Blaze – Bias and Credibility

Natural Blaze - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Natural Blaze a pseudoscience website due to its strong bias towards alternative health practices and skepticism of conventional medicine. Factually, the site is mixed due to some credible sources like Study Finds, but it often includes unverified and controversial claims and a lack of transparency in ownership.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History 

Natural Blaze is a website focusing on “Natural Health & Wellness News,” covering topics such as alternative medicine, natural remedies, health freedom, homesteading, preparedness, and an organic lifestyle. The website emphasizes the importance of freeing oneself from mainstream medicine and often criticizes conventional healthcare practices. The website does not provide information about when it was formed, who founded it, or where it is located.

Funded by / Ownership

Natural Blaze’s website does not disclose specific ownership information. The site generates revenue through advertising and affiliate marketing.

Analysis / Bias

Natural Blaze exhibits a strong bias towards promoting alternative health practices while expressing skepticism towards conventional medicine. The articles often use emotionally loaded and sensational language, as seen in the article “The Only Publicity is Good Publicity When it Comes to Big Pharma.” This piece criticizes the pharmaceutical industry, suggesting that all publicity, even negative, benefits Big Pharma. The language is emotionally loaded, with terms like “Big Pharma” evoking negative connotations. Notably, the article is republished from The Conscious Resistance Network, which has not yet been rated by Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC). Clicking the link results in a “Page Not Found” error. 

Another example is the article “Florida Becomes First State To Ban ‘Fake Meat,'” which discusses Florida’s ban on lab-grown meat and presents it as a victory for natural food advocates. The language is again emotionally charged, using terms like “fake meat” to provoke a reaction. This article is sourced from Zero Hedge, a website rated by MBFC as having a “Right” bias rating and categorized under “Conspiracy/Pseudoscience.”​ Another pseudoscience website they republish articles from is GreenMedInfo. This association further suggests a propensity for biased and potentially unreliable reporting.

In contrast, the article “Colorectal Cancer Cases Among Kids Skyrockets by 500% — What’s Causing It?” is sourced from Study Finds, which MBFC rates as “Least Biased” with “High” factual reporting. This article discusses the alarming rise in colorectal cancer cases among children, providing a more balanced and credible analysis backed by scientific research.



In general, Natural Blaze typically promotes alternative health news and natural living. It is strongly biased toward promoting holistic and homeopathic remedies while being skeptical of conventional medicine. The site’s content often includes a tendency to publish unverified and controversial claims.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate the Natural Blaze a pseudoscience website due to its strong bias towards alternative health practices and skepticism of conventional medicine. Factually, the site is mixed due to some credible sources like Study Finds, but it often includes unverified and controversial claims and a lack of transparency in ownership. (M. Huitsing 05/18/2024)

Source: https://www.naturalblaze.com/

Last Updated on May 18, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: