GreenMedInfo – Bias and Credibility

GreenMedInfo - Conspiracy - Fake News - Not Credible - BiasGreenMedInfo - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Not Credible - Bias

Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information. Therefore fact checking and further investigation are recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate GreenMedInfo a quackery-level pseudoscience website based on claims not supported by science.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


Founded in 2008 by Sayer Ji, GreenMedInfo is an alternative health pseudoscience website. According to their mission statement, “GreenMedInfo is dedicated to providing evidence-based natural medical information. Through open access, paid memberships, and high-quality educational products, GreenMedInfo provides physicians, healthcare practitioners, clinicians, researchers, and consumers a resource to determine the therapeutic value of vitamins, minerals, herbs, and foods.”

According to their about page, “Sayer Ji is an author, activist, speaker, and widely recognized thought leader in the natural health and wellness space.”

On Dec. 13th, 2018, Pinterest removed from its platform.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Sayer Ji owns the website through GreenMedInfo LLC. Revenue is derived through membership fees and donations.

Analysis / Bias

In review, GreenMedInfo primarily publishes alternative health and nutrition information. For example, they publish journal abstracts from Pubmed, which are generally pro-science. However, GreenMedInfo also publishes original articles such as this: Coronavirus Death Rate Lower Than Thought. This story is reasonably sourced from the World Health Organization and Stat News. At the same time, some articles are accurate and align with the consensus of science. Many do not.

GreenMedInfo frequently publishes false information about a link between Autism and vaccinations: Mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines raised the subsequent risk of atypical autism diagnosis. According to the CDC, there is no link between vaccines and autism. Further, they promote miracle cures for cancer, such as this Research: Plants Cure Cancer, Not Chemicals. Finally, they also promote conspiracy theories such as this Why Doctors”Do Not Want to Find a Cure for Cancer.” When it comes to sourcing, GreenMedInfo routinely relies on very poor sources such as Natural News and Mercola.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate GreenMedInfo a quackery-level pseudoscience website based on claims not supported by science. (D. Van Zandt 3/21/2020) Updated (08/01/2022)


Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: