Must Read Alaska – Bias and Credibility

Must Read Alaska - Right Biased - Conservative - Nationalism - Republican - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, Must Read Alaska is a right-biased outlet with strong conservative editorial positioning and recurrent culture-war content. Factual reporting is mixed due to poor sourcing, one-sided commentary, and promotion of pseudoscientific/unsupported claims.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Must Read Alaska describes itself as covering people, politics, policy, culture, and happenings in Alaska. It publishes news, opinion, and listicles, and is located in Homer, Alaska.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The site presents itself as independently owned; it solicits reader support via Support MRAK and features advertising. The site lists a physical mailing address (Homer, Alaska) and a contact email, but does not provide detailed ownership/LLC disclosures or a full masthead, resulting in partial transparency.

Analysis / Bias

News and culture posts appear, but commentary is heavily right-leaning with recurring emphasis on gender/education culture-war frames. For example, an unsigned column alleges schools “hide gender transitions from parents”. It asserts federal probes and violations without sourcing or links, using loaded language about DEI and “indoctrination” (Tim Barto column).

Another commentary ridicules Democratic messaging, citing a “Third Way memo” without providing links or documents, instead relying on mockery rather than evidence (Listicle). The site also publishes medical-policy opinions that promote ivermectin efficacy claims and portray agencies/media as suppressing a “life-saving medicine,” again without providing study citations, RCT links, or robust sourcing (Linda Boyle on Pierre Kory/ivermectin). Straight news is present but often interwoven with editorial framing; consistent lack of hyperlinks in sampled items indicates weak sourcing standards.



Failed Fact Check

  • We did not locate third-party fact checks of Must Read Alaska specifically; however, multiple articles contain unsupported or pseudoscientific assertions and omit corroborating sources. Examples include the unsourced claims of federal investigations and district policies in the Tim Barto column; the unlinked “Third Way” memo in the Listicle; and medical claims favoring ivermectin in the Linda Boyle piece.

Overall, Must Read Alaska is a right-biased outlet with strong conservative editorial positioning and recurrent culture-war content. Factual reporting is mixed due to poor sourcing, one-sided commentary, and promotion of pseudoscientific/unsupported claims. (D. Van Zandt 08/30/2025)

Source: https://mustreadalaska.com/

Last Updated on August 30, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: