QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Mixi.Media Questionable based on poor sourcing, linking to pseudoscience, and a complete lack of transparency.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Pseudoscience, Lack of Transparency
Country: Unknown
History
Founded in 2018, Mixi.Media is a news aggregation website that does not have an about page nor ownership information. A domain search reveals the domain is registered privately.
Funded by / Ownership
Mixi.Media does not disclose ownership on the website. Revenue appears to be drawn from online advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Mixi.Media aggregates right-leaning news from other sources. A review of sources indicates most come from the right such as Newsmax, The Political Insider, and Grabien as well as many from our questionable lists such as The Blaze, RT, Sputnik, and Newsner. The science category contains numerous pseudoscience stories from Sputnik. In general, this is a right-leaning news aggregation website that utilizes many poor sources that have poor track records with fact-checkers.
Overall, we rate Mixi.Media Questionable based on poor sourcing, linking to pseudoscience, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 3/19/2019)
Source: https://mixi.media/
Last Updated on June 21, 2020 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
