LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Marxists Internet Archive (MIA) as Far-Left Biased based on its exclusive focus on Marxist and socialist literature and perspectives. While this focus is inherent in its nature as a repository for Marxist texts, it limits the diversity of viewpoints and political spectrums represented; therefore, we rate them mostly factual rather than high in reporting.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: FAR-LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: United States
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Launched in 1990, The Marxists Internet Archive (MIA) is a digital repository offering various Marxist, anarchist, and socialist literature in various languages. Initially formed by an individual known as the Zodiac, it grew through the efforts of numerous volunteers. In 1998, the marxists.org domain was established, solidifying its presence as an online resource for Marxist and non-Marxist literature.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
MIA is a California-based non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization., primarily sustained through donations, possibly book sales and volunteer support. They maintain transparency in their financial operations by publicly sharing detailed financial reports accessible at MIA Financial Reports.
Analysis / Bias
The Marxists Internet Archive (MIA) provides left-leaning content from a Marxist, anarchist, and socialist viewpoint. The articles range from academic texts to opinion-based editorials. While its political bias is apparent, it does not necessarily compromise the factual accuracy of its historical and academic content. Many articles on MIA come with extensive lists of sources cited, often including historical texts, speeches, and writings by notable figures in socialist, Marxist, and anarchist thought.
For example, writings may reference works by Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, or contemporary leftist thinkers. The tone of MIA’s content can vary. Academic and historical pieces like Lenin’s “On the Eve” article have a formal and informative tone. However, opinion pieces or editorials might exhibit a more emotionally loaded or persuasive tone, aiming to advocate for certain viewpoints or interpretations consistent with leftist ideologies.
An example of this type of article is “Sanders, Trump and the US Working Class,” which was originally published in International Socialism, a journal known for its socialist perspective. This publication typically presents analyses and commentaries on political and economic issues through a socialist lens. MIA republished this article on its platform, which examines the political dynamics of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, focusing on Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. It approaches the subject from a clearly defined socialist perspective, analyzing how each candidate’s campaign and policies relate to the interests and struggles of the working class in the U.S.
The article uses emotionally loaded language such as: “The most striking element of his campaign so far is his insistence that his candidature is part of a movement.” This quote reflects a positive view of Sanders’s campaign, emphasizing its nature as a movement rather than just a political campaign. The sources referenced, such as Pew Research Center, NPR, and The Atlantic, are generally considered credible and reliable for factual information. References to speeches by public figures like Bernie Sanders and analyses from known publications add to the credibility of the information presented.
The article’s sources are generally factual, but its editorial perspective may influence source selection. It includes articles from socialist publications like “Against the Current”, evident in pieces like “Trump and the Middle East,” indicating a left-leaning bias. In general, MIA predominantly republishes content from socialist or left-wing sources, such as the International Socialism Journal, associated with the Socialist Workers Party. This focus may limit the presentation of diverse viewpoints. For a more balanced approach, sourcing content from various political and ideological perspectives would be beneficial.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years. Fact-checkers have referenced them for claims about Marxism.
Overall, we rate the Marxists Internet Archive (MIA) as Far-Left Biased based on its exclusive focus on Marxist and socialist literature and perspectives. While this focus is inherent in its nature as a repository for Marxist texts, it limits the diversity of viewpoints and political spectrums represented; therefore, we rate them mostly factual rather than high in reporting. (M. Huitsing 01/24/2024)
Source: https://www.marxists.org/
Last Updated on April 5, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources