LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate HistoryNet as least biased based on minimal editorizing of content. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to poor sourcing practices that make it difficult to verify the accuracy of their claims.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.8)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.2)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine/Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
HistoryNet, established in 2006 by Eric Weider (nephew of fitness legend Joe Weider and son of Ben Weider, president of the International Federation of BodyBuilders), is the publisher of history magazines featuring a broad range of articles, photo galleries on various historical topics and periods. As a network, it combines content from several history magazines. The company is headquartered in Washington, DC.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
HistoryNet was founded by Eric Weider, who also serves as its publisher. In addition to HistoryNet, he is the publisher of Armchair General Magazine. Under the umbrella of the World History Group, HistoryNet operates as a commercial entity funded through magazine sales, subscriptions, and advertising.
Analysis / Bias
A review of several articles, such as “African American Theater Performers Turned Stereotype Upside Down,” provides a factual recount of African American history on Broadway, focusing on the progression from stereotypical roles to multifaceted character portrayals featuring a collection of historical photographs, providing visual documentation of the era and the subjects discussed.
The article “Donald Trump Indictment: Read the Original Document of Charges” is a straightforward report on a significant legal event, maintaining a neutral tone. “Biden and Johnson Outline ‘New’ Atlantic Charter” discusses the historical and current relevance of the Atlantic Charter, upholding an objective stance, and “Is Trump History’s Newest Patriot King?” explores Trump’s political rise through a historical lens, comparing it to the concept of a “patriot king.” The article maintains neutrality, focusing on historical analysis rather than contemporary political debate.
These articles maintain a neutral tone, focusing on historical context over political commentary with an emphasis on detailed historical context. The content is devoid of political partisanship, sticking to its mission of historical education and analysis. Regarding sourcing, HistoryNet generally uses large quotes and occasionally uses primary sources, as seen in the article on Donald Trump’s indictment, where the original indictment document is provided. However, this is not consistently applied across all articles. Furthermore, many articles on the site lack external hyperlinks for further reference, often relying instead on internal or circular referencing.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate HistoryNet as least biased based on minimal editorizing of content. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to poor sourcing practices that make it difficult to verify the accuracy of their claims. (M. Huitsing 12/21/2023) Updated (11/14/2025)
Source: https://www.historynet.com/
Last Updated on November 14, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources