HealthLine

Last updated on April 21st, 2021 at 05:06 pm

Healthline - Pro Science - Credible - Medical

Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, this is a pro-science medical information website that scientifically sources its information but sometimes promotes alternative health.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Healthline Media was founded in 1999 as YourDoctor.com by endocrine specialist Dr. James Norman. In 2006, the company was re-launched as Healthline Networks. Healthline.com is the Healthline Media’s website, Healthline.com, is a destination site for health and wellness information and a competitor to WebMD.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Summit Partners own Healthline. They generate revenue through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Healthline provides health and wellness information that is scientifically based. Most articles are written in an easy-to-understand format and sourced to medical journals. However, this website also covers alternative health that is unproven to be effective. For example, they promote the Health Benefits of Throat Chakra Stones, which does not have scientific data to prove that it works. While Healthline lists the supposed benefits of Throat Chakra Stones, they also indicate several times in the articles that there isn’t scientific evidence to support their use. It might be best not to report on unproven alt health. Most content is factual and scientific; however, because they allow room for pseudoscience, we rate them Mostly Factual rather than High.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None to date

Overall, this is a pro-science medical information website that scientifically sources its information but sometimes promotes alternative health. (D. Van Zandt 2/23/2018) Updated (3/24/2021)

Source: https://www.healthline.com/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Video Advertisement

Share: