Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate CreationWiki a Quackery-level pseudoscience site based on promoting unproven biblical claims such as divine biblical creation.
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
CreationWiki is a supposed Wiki page (that has strict editing criteria) that highlights the view that creationism is real and attempts to provide evidence. This is not possible and hence why this site lands on this page.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
The Northwest Creation Network owns and publishes CreationWiki as they solicit donations.
Analysis / Bias
There are numerous dubious science claims made, but RationalWiki has already done a fantastic job covering this. There is no need for us to elaborate on the obvious. Check out RationalWiki for a more detailed account of why this source is a quackery site.
Overall, we rate CreationWiki a Quackery-level pseudoscience site based on promoting unproven biblical claims such as divine biblical creation. (D. Van Zandt 2/23/2018) Updated (06/26/2022)
Last Updated on May 22, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources