Frontiers in Genome Editing – Bias and Credibility

Frontiers in Genome Editing - Pro Science - Non-Biased - Credible - Trustworthy

Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Frontiers in Genome Editing as a Pro-Science journal based on peer review and a clean fact-check record. We also rate them Mostly Factual due to Frontier Media’s retractions of studies either pre or post-publication.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Frontiers in Genome Editing is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that covers Genome Editing. According to its About page, “Frontiers in Genome Editing is a multidisciplinary journal that explores innovations in, and the applications of, genome and epigenome editing technologies within human health, animal science, and plant science.”

Read our profile on Switzerland’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Frontiers in Genome Editing is owned by Frontiers Media SA, which is a for-profit corporation. Funding comes from digital sales of content and author fees for publication.

Analysis / Bias

Frontiers in Genome Editing is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to Genome Editing. The journal primarily publishes research like this: The 4Fs of cotton: Genome editing of cotton for food, feed, fiber, and fuel to achieve zero hunger.



Frontiers Media has been criticized for being a predatory open-access publisher. In short, Predatory Open Access publishing is an exploitative open-access publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without providing the editorial and publishing services associated with legitimate journals.

However, Frontiers in Genome Editing is a credible scientific journal, as we have not found any controversy or significant retractions. However, Frontiers Media has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Frontiers in Genome Editing as a Pro-Science journal based on peer review and a clean fact-check record. We also rate them Mostly Factual due to Frontier Media’s retractions of studies either pre or post-publication. (D. Van Zandt 09/01/2024)

Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genome-editing

Last Updated on September 1, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: