A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked per article. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Femalista strongly left-biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing of information and a complete lack of transparency regarding authors and ownership.
Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Founded in 2017, Femalista is a feminist news and opinion website affiliated with the Facebook page Women’s Rights News. According to their about page, “We promote and advocate an array of topics from global gender equality, feminism, gay rights, shaming & bullying, body-positive & acceptance, rape, rape culture, victim-blaming, reproductive rights / pro-choice, women’s health, domestic & sexual abuse, survivor & victim stories, SHEroes, human rights, gender pay gap and so much more.
Besides an about page, the website lacks transparency as it does not disclose ownership, editors, or authors.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Femalista does not openly state ownership; however, the terms and conditions page indicates they are controlled by Perfect Insight, Inc. A search for this company reveals they were dissolved in 2017. Revenue is derived through advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Femalista breaks news into categories such as Women, Activism, Beauty & Health, Body & Love, LGBT, Parenting, and Politics. Story selection favors a liberal perspective and utilizes moderately loaded emotional wording such as this Judge Rules Women’s Soccer Can Continue Earning Less Than Men, Even If They Do More Work. This story, like most, is published by the anonymous WRN Editor and is sourced to a Twitter video. A review of several articles indicates they do not source information properly.
Editorially, Femalista leans strongly left, advocating for LGBT and women’s rights and holding pro-choice positions such as this Women’s Rights Groups Concerned That Polish Conservative Government Will Tighten Abortion Rights During COVID-19 Crisis. Further, they reject racism, How Racism In US Health System Hinders Care And Costs Lives Of African Americans, and promote concern for human-influenced climate change Guy Argues That “Social Justice Warriors” Can’t Prove Global Warming Is Real, Gets Destroyed By Facts. Finally, they often report negatively on Conservatives and President Trump, such as this 8-Year-Old Girl Scaled President Trump’s “Virtually Impenetrable” Border Wall. In general, story selection almost always favors the left, and while most stories are factual, it is difficult to prove the veracity of claims due to poor sourcing.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Femalista strongly left-biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing of information and a complete lack of transparency regarding authors and ownership. (D. Van Zandt 7/13/2020) Updated (06/29/2022)
Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources