Daily Crime Post is rated Least biased with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Daily Crime Post Least Biased and Questionable due to its lack of discernible political ideology combined with poor transparency, weak sourcing, unverifiable staff information, and unclear editorial accountability. We rate it Mixed for factual reporting because its crime narratives are often plausible and detailed, but the absence of robust sourcing and transparent editorial practices makes independent verification difficult.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Unverifiable Staff Information, Poor Sourcing, Unclear Editorial Accountability
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1)
Country: Unknown / Not Disclosed
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Daily Crime Post is a news and true-crime website founded in July 2025. According to its About page, the publication was founded by Abdullah Rahim, who serves as Editor-in-Chief. The site states that its team also includes writer Lucien Folter and researcher/fact-checker Robert Hunter.
Despite its name, Daily Crime Post originally described its coverage as including legal, health, science, and technology news. Its current content is overwhelmingly focused on true crime, particularly detailed reconstructions of murder cases from the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and other countries.
The website does not clearly disclose where it is headquartered or provide a verifiable physical business address.
Funded by / Ownership
Daily Crime Post identifies Abdullah Rahim as its founder and Editor-in-Chief but does not disclose a legal corporate owner, detailed funding structure, investors, or business address on its About page.
The website carries advertising and appears to rely primarily on digital advertising revenue. Its About page identifies a small editorial team, but there is limited independent information available regarding the listed staff. For example, the site states that writer Lucien Folter is a law student at “Dennings School of Law,” but we could not locate independent information confirming an institution by that name. This lack of independently verifiable staff and ownership information significantly reduces transparency.
Analysis / Bias
Daily Crime Post demonstrates little discernible political bias because its current content is overwhelmingly focused on historical and contemporary criminal cases rather than partisan politics or public policy. Story selection emphasizes murders, missing persons, criminal investigations, trials, and unusual or sensational crimes.
For example, Heather Bogle Disappeared After Work, and Her Body Was Found in Her Car’s Trunk the Next Day provides a lengthy reconstruction of a 2015 Ohio murder case, including the investigation, wrongful suspicion of several individuals, misconduct by a detective, and the eventual conviction of Daniel Myers. Similarly, Kristen Trickle Was Found Shot in Her Bedroom recounts the investigation and prosecution of her husband through trial and appeal.
The principal concern is sourcing. Although many articles contain detailed factual narratives and credit photographs to outlets such as CBS News, ABC affiliates, police departments, or social media, they generally do not provide readers with comprehensive hyperlinks or citations showing where the underlying reporting originated. This makes it difficult to independently verify lengthy narratives containing dozens of specific factual claims.
Daily Crime Post’s About page states that its reporting is “well-researched,” “fact-checked,” and original. However, much of the site’s output appears to summarize or reconstruct previously reported criminal cases rather than provide identifiable firsthand reporting, and the website does not clearly explain its sourcing methodology, corrections process, or fact-checking procedures.
The repetitive structure, high volume of lengthy narrative articles, and generic prose may suggest AI-assisted production, but we found no disclosure or independent evidence sufficient to classify the site’s content as AI-generated. Therefore, AI use remains unconfirmed.
We classify Daily Crime Post as Questionable because readers are asked to trust detailed crime reporting from a publication with limited ownership disclosure, weak article-level sourcing, minimal information about its editorial process, and staff credentials that are difficult to independently verify. These transparency and accountability problems substantially reduce confidence in the publication even though we found little evidence of political bias or a documented pattern of fabricated stories.
Failed Fact Checks
- None found from major fact-checking organizations.
Overall, we rate Daily Crime Post Least Biased and Questionable due to its lack of discernible political ideology combined with poor transparency, weak sourcing, unverifiable staff information, and unclear editorial accountability. We rate it Mixed for factual reporting because its crime narratives are often plausible and detailed, but the absence of robust sourcing and transparent editorial practices makes independent verification difficult. (D. Van Zandt 11/11/2026)
Source: https://dailycrimepost.com/
Last Updated on November 11, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources