RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we Climate Cosmos Right-Center biased based on editorial perspectives aligned with conservative environmental positions. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to reporting that does not always align with the consensus and a significant lack of transparency.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.0)
Country: Germany
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Climate Cosmos is a media platform focused on climate news, renewable energy, and space science. The site claims to provide insights into climate change, sustainability, and science-related topics. While it presents itself as a science-focused website, its reporting leans heavily toward right-leaning conservative climate viewpoints.
Read our profile on German media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
NextVision Media UG, a Germany-based company in Kist, Germany, owns Climate Cosmos. The company is structured as a “Unternehmergesellschaft (haftungsbeschränkt)” (UG), which is a type of limited liability company similar to an LLC.
However, there is no additional public information about NextVision Media UG, including its leadership, funding sources, or other media properties it may operate. The website does not disclose whether advertising, donations, or other revenue streams support it. The lack of transparency regarding its financial backing and editorial oversight is a concern.
Analysis / Bias
While Climate Cosmos claims to focus on climate-related issues, its editorial stance consistently leans skeptical toward renewable energy and environmental initiatives. Articles such as “The Hidden Cost of Renewable Energy Expansion” and “Why Are Climate Models Always Wrong – And Why Does No One Question It?” suggest a pattern of casting doubt on widely accepted climate science and renewable technology.
The website sources information inconsistently, often relying on commentary or unsourced claims. Though some articles support climate action, the overall editorial tone presents renewables and climate models with skepticism, suggesting a possible alignment with right-leaning environmental critics. The blend of climate advocacy with a contrarian tone toward green energy initiatives contributes to a confusing and ideologically mixed narrative.
While Climate Cosmos does publish science-related content, such as “12 Ways to Reduce Climate Change” and “Multiverse: What Was Before the Big Bang?”, some of these articles veer into speculative territory rather than strictly scientific reporting. Articles about the multiverse theory and what happened before the Big Bang discuss topics that are highly theoretical and not fully accepted within mainstream physics.
Overall, the site favors right-leaning environmental policies and frames renewable energy viewpoints negatively, resulting in a moderate right-leaning bias.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we Climate Cosmos Right-Center biased based on editorial perspectives aligned with conservative environmental positions. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to reporting that does not always align with the consensus and a significant lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 02/11/2025) Updated (03/24/2025)
Source: https://climatecosmos.com/
Last Updated on March 24, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources