QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Al Arabiya as Questionable due to excessive government censorship that results in the publication of pro-state propaganda. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the omission of key facts in stories.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, State Propaganda
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Saudi Arabia
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: TOTAL OPPRESSION
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Launched in 2004, Al Arabiya is the official website for the TV station Al Arabiya and is based in Dubai. Al Arabiya features 24-hour digital news, business, entertainment, lifestyle, sports, and more.
Read our profile on Saudi Arabia’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Al Arabiya is owned by the Saudi broadcaster Middle East Broadcasting Center (MBC), which also owns satellite TV channels. According to Reuters, in 2018, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman launched a corruption operation and acquired 60% of founder Waleed al-Ibrahim’s shares of the Middle East Broadcasting Center (MBC). Al Ibrahim retained 40% of his shares and his capacity as chairman. The Financial Times reports that this crackdown “hints that Prince Mohammed is tightening the government’s grip on the media.”
Analysis / Bias
According to a BBC profile on Saudi Arabia’s media “Criticism of the government and royal family and the questioning of Islamic tenets are not generally tolerated. Self-censorship is pervasive.”
In review, Al Arabiya publishes articles with strong, emotionally loaded language such as “Troublemaker vs. Superpower: Iran’s absurd claim of power equivalence with US.” Al Arabia reports selectively when the issue doesn’t resonate with the King. For example, when reporting on Trump’s statement regarding the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, they published only the part of the speech where it didn’t offend Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. On issues such as women’s rights, Al Arabiya reports with a pro-reform stance “How Saudi Arabia has increased female employment, and why the country benefits.”
When it comes to sourcing, Al Arabiya often hyperlinks to itself and republishes news from Reuters. Al Arabiya also utilizes credible sources such as weforum.org, and uchicago.edu. When covering world news pertaining to the USA, they cover the Trump administration with a positive tone “Ivanka Trump praises progress made by Saudi Arabia in gender equality”. In general, the news that is presented is factual; however, it is heavily censored by the government to not portray Saudi Arabia and especially the Crown Prince in a negative light. Therefore, we rate them as a very strong propaganda source.
Failed Fact Checks
- There is no record of Al Arabiya being fact-checked.
Overall, we rate Al Arabiya as Questionable due to excessive government censorship that results in the publication of pro-state propaganda. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the omission of key facts in stories. (8/16/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 10/06/2023)
Source: https://english.alarabiya.net/
Last Updated on October 6, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources