1stHeadlines – Bias and Credibility

1stHeadlines - Least Biased - Conservative leaning - Not Credible or ReliableFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate 1stHeadlines as Least Biased due to its aggregation of news from various sources across the political spectrum. We rate it as Mixed for factual reporting because the platform relies on various external sources with differing levels of factual reliability and lacks transparency regarding its ownership.


Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (1.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

1stHeadlines is an online news aggregator that curates headlines from a variety of global outlets. Launched in the early 2000s, the platform organizes links into political, business, and world news categories. It does not produce original content but is a centralized hub for users to access external news stories. The domain is registered in the United States.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Ownership details for 1stHeadlines are not publicly disclosed on the website. The platform generates revenue through advertising.

Analysis / Bias

As a news aggregator, 1stHeadlines does not create content or take editorial stances. The bias of the platform would depend on the selection of sources it curates. Reviewing the aggregated content reveals a mix of mainstream and independent outlets with varying political leanings.  The platform aggregates articles from a mix of sources, ranging from right-leaning outlets like the Washington Times to mainstream media such as ABC News, BBC, and CNN. For example, recent headlines include: “China missile test a key sign of Rocket Force power” from the Washington Times, which emphasizes national security and military strength, aligning with conservative framing. 

Another article titled “Weather hampers a search for 3 American and Canadian climbers missing on New Zealand’s highest peak” is from ABC News. The diversity of sources suggests that 1stHeadlines does not heavily favor one ideological viewpoint. However, the reliance on external outlets means the platform’s perceived bias is shaped by its selection process, which lacks transparency.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None as they do not produce original content. However, the sources they aggregate have failed fact checks.

Overall, we rate 1stHeadlines as Least Biased due to its aggregation of news from various sources across the political spectrum. We rate it as Mixed for factual reporting because the platform relies on various external sources with differing levels of factual reliability and lacks transparency regarding its ownership. (M. Huitsing 12/05/2024)

Source: https://www.1stheadlines.com/

Last Updated on December 5, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: