Wikispooks

Last updated on February 5th, 2021 at 08:48 pm

WikiSpooks - Conspiracy - Fake news - Not credible - BiasWikiSpooks - Pseudoscience - Fake news - Not credible - BiasFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Unknown

History

According to their about page “WikiSpooks was established in 2010 as a collaborative space for the joint re-examination of recent history. We research people and groups not subject to proper scrutiny by corporate media and as such, poorly treated by Wikipedia. WikiSpooks is particularly focused on those official narratives which do not seem to fit the facts, such as the 9/11 event and concepts such a the “war on terror” or the “war on drugs“.

Funded by / Ownership

Wikispooks is a wiki and is funded through donations.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Wikispooks claims to be a source of deep politics, with a forum that publishes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience such as this Bilderberg/Effect. This is not a trustworthy source.

Overall, WikiSpooks is a far right biased source that is questionable based on a lack of transparency, poor sourcing and false claims.. (1/19/2017) Updated (D. Van Zandt 2/5/2021)

Source: https://wikispooks.com/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Share: