QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Urban Scoop as Far-Right Biased due to its selective reporting, emphasis on divisive narratives, and close association with Tommy Robinson. Its reporting is rated as questionable, often amplifying misleading or unverified claims while framing issues to align with its far-right ideological perspective.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Hate, False Information
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT (8.3)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Urban Scoop is a UK-based media platform positioning itself as a champion of voices allegedly ignored by mainstream media. It claims to offer “honest, in-depth, and unfiltered content.” However, Urban Scoop has strong ties to far-right activist Tommy Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon), a figure associated with anti-immigration and anti-Islam narratives. Robinson prominently features on the platform, using it as a vehicle for his media work, fundraising efforts, and public messaging.
Read our profile on the UK media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Urban Scoop relies heavily on donations from its website and social media platforms. Tommy Robinson, the face of the platform, reportedly receives financial backing from wealthy backers, such as American tech billionaire Robert Shillman, alongside smaller contributions from individual supporters. Urban Scoop’s operations have also been linked to Freestyle Freelance Ltd, which was voluntarily liquidated at the end of 2023.
Analysis / Bias
Urban Scoop produces content, including videos and articles, that frequently align with far-right perspectives, focusing on topics like immigration and Islam.
In the article “Biological Men Using Female Toilets At UEA,” Urban Scoop discusses incidents at the University of East Anglia where transgender individuals used female facilities. The piece emphasizes concerns about women’s safety and privacy, reflecting a one-sided narrative that prioritizes critiques of transgender advocacy.
Another piece, “The Marriage Of Political Islam And Marxism On Cambridge Campus,” reports on protests at Cambridge University advocating for divestment from Israel. The article frames the protests as an alliance between political Islam and Marxist ideology, raising concerns about ideological influence in academic institutions.
Urban Scoop also inaccurately reported that the suspect in a Southport stabbing was “not a British guy” despite police confirming otherwise. This misreporting aligns with a pattern of framing stories in ways that reflect ideological bias.
The platform frequently emphasizes Robinson’s legal battles and encourages donations for his causes. For example, its homepage prominently features pop-ups requesting contributions, directly linking financial support to Robinson’s activism.
In general, Urban Scoop’s content primarily reflects a specific ideological stance and offers limited alternative viewpoints. Robinson frequently leverages his legal troubles to portray himself as a victim of persecution and generate fundraising opportunities.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years. See above.
Overall, we rate Urban Scoop as Far-Right Biased due to its selective reporting, emphasis on divisive narratives, and close association with Tommy Robinson. Its reporting is rated as questionable, often amplifying misleading or unverified claims while framing issues to align with its far-right ideological perspective. (M. Huitsing 01/02/2025)
Source: https://www.urbanscoop.news/
Last Updated on January 2, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

