The Washington Spectator – Bias and Credibility

Washington Spectator- Left Bias - Liberal - Progressive - Democrat - Credible - ReliableFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate The Washington Spectator Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that consistently favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 1974 by veteran Capitol Hill reporter and Vietnam War critic Tristram Coffin, The Washington Spectator is a monthly liberal independent political periodical based in New York City. According to their about page, “the Spectator delivers a unique blend of sharp-edged investigative reporting, informed social and political commentary, and cultural criticism and essays on topics ranging from popular cinema to the new women’s movement, to the recent advances in artificial intelligence.”

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The Washington Spectator is published by The Public Concern Foundation, a “nonprofit educational foundation dedicated to the study of current political and social issues, the dissemination of those findings, and the expansion of the public discourse on political and social values and ideals.” Revenue for The Washington Spectator is derived through print subscription sales and donations.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the print edition of the Washington Spectator, generally in “every issue covers a single topic—most often, one that its editors believe is not receiving sufficient coverage in the mainstream media outlets.” The website publishes articles related to politics, the world, culture, and the economy. Articles and headlines utilize strongly loaded language that favors a left-leaning perspective, such as this Anatomy of Deceit: Team Trump Deploys Doctors with Dubious Qualifications to Push Fake Cure for Covid-19. This story, like most, is thoroughly sourced from credible media outlets such as Politifact, New York Times, and the CDC.

Editorially, The Washington Spectator promotes left-leaning policies such as environmentalism and supports the consensus of science regarding climate change, Event: Mobilizing to Defeat Climate Change. Other policies supported are LGBTQ rights, Black Lives Matter, and negative reporting on conservatives and former President Donald Trump. They generally report the news factually and with a consistent left-leaning bias.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate The Washington Spectator Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that consistently favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 9/27/2020) Updated (06/06/2022)

Source: https://washingtonspectator.org/

Last Updated on July 1, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: