Daily Galaxy is rated Left-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Daily Galaxy Left-Center biased based on climate and environmental coverage that generally favors mainstream progressive policy perspectives. We rate it Mostly Factual due to reliance on legitimate scientific research and primary sources, but deduct for sensationalized headlines, occasional exaggeration, and documented factual errors that indicate inconsistent editorial oversight.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.5)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.4)
Country: Algeria
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: LIMITED FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Daily Galaxy is a science, space, climate, and aerospace news website launched in 2007. According to its About page, the publication focuses on space exploration, climate change, strategic defense, and scientific developments.
The site was founded by technology-media veteran Val Landi. It was later acquired by Whitefish Ventures in 2020. Current ownership and publishing information has since changed, with Daily Galaxy’s legal notice identifying SST-AGENCY in Tizi Ouzou, Algeria, as the publisher. The current editorial team lists Samir Sebti as CEO and Arezki Amiri as Editor-in-Chief and Project Manager.
Read our profile on Algerian media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Daily Galaxy is currently published by SST-AGENCY, based in Tizi Ouzou, Algeria. Kouceila Rekik is listed as Publishing Director. Revenue is generated through display advertising, newsletter sponsorships, and commercial partnerships. According to its advertising page, Daily Galaxy does not sell sponsored articles or paid guest posts and states that commercial activity is separated from editorial content.
Analysis / Bias
Daily Galaxy publishes science and technology coverage that generally follows mainstream scientific consensus, particularly regarding climate change, astronomy, physics, and space exploration. However, headlines are frequently sensationalized and can exaggerate the significance or certainty of the underlying research.
For example, Earth’s Temperature Is Heating Up Twice as Fast as It Did in the Past, and the Effects Are Already Seen reports on research published in Geophysical Research Letters. The article accurately reflects the study’s central conclusion that adjusted global temperature data show statistically significant acceleration in warming since roughly 2013-2014. The original peer-reviewed study found acceleration with greater than 98% confidence.
Coverage of climate change and environmental policy generally reflects mainstream scientific findings and tends to favor stronger environmental action, producing a slight Left-Center editorial lean.
Factual problems do occur. In Scientists Revived a Creature Frozen in Siberia for 24,000 Years, the article correctly summarizes a 2021 Current Biology study showing that a bdelloid rotifer was recovered from approximately 24,000-year-old permafrost and reproduced after thawing. However, the opening incorrectly states that scientists drilled near Vostok Station in Antarctica. The original study clearly states that the specimen came from northeastern Siberian permafrost.
The publication frequently uses dramatic headlines such as discoveries being “shocking,” “mysterious,” or potentially transformative, even when the underlying studies are more cautious. This presentation can overstate certainty or novelty, particularly in astronomy, archaeology, climate, and speculative science.
Daily Galaxy maintains a corrections policy stating that substantive factual errors are corrected with permanent dated notices and that reports are checked against primary sources. This adds transparency, although the factual error identified above indicates that editorial verification is not always sufficient.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate Daily Galaxy Left-Center biased based on climate and environmental coverage that generally favors mainstream progressive policy perspectives. We rate it Mostly Factual due to reliance on legitimate scientific research and primary sources, but deduct for sensationalized headlines, occasional exaggeration, and documented factual errors that indicate inconsistent editorial oversight. (D. Van Zandt 09/06/2026)
Source: https://dailygalaxy.com/
Last Updated on September 6, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources