The Federalist Papers Project – Bias and Credibility

Federalist Papers Project - Questionable - Right Bias - conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Update: As of February 2024, this website now redirects to tfppwire.com.

  • Overall, we rate The Federalist Papers Project Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and a few failed fact checks by IFCN fact-checkers.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, False Claims
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2011, The Federalist Papers Project is far-right news and opinion website. According to their about page, the mission of the Federalist Papers Project “is to get people the power that knowledge gives to motivate them to push back at the erosion of our liberties and restore the constitutionally limited small government.” The founder and director of FPP are Steve Straub.

Funded by / Ownership

The website is owned by Integrated Marketing Group, which Steve Straub owns. The Federalist Papers Project generates revenue through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Federalist Papers Project offers two types of content. First, they republish content from the right-leaning and factually mixed Daily Caller, and the other is original opinion pieces that utilize strongly loaded language in favor of the right. Here are some examples: This Is The List of Every Current National Emergency And It Is A Nightmare For Dems and Jim Acosta Insults Angel Moms Then Gets Owned By One. In both of these examples, there is zero sourcing of any kind to support their claims.

Generally, every story on the Federalist Papers Project favors the right and denigrates the left. The FPP also promotes right-wing conspiracies, such as the Clinton’s being responsible for numerous deaths and promoting deep state conspiracies.



Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate The Federalist Papers Project Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and a few failed fact checks by IFCN fact-checkers. (9/12/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 02/14/2024)

Source: http://thefederalistpapers.org/

This poll is for entertainment purposes and does not change our overall rating.

Last Updated on February 18, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: