LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate TechNode as Least Biased due to its focus on technology and business reporting without direct political commentary. Its reporting is rated as Mixed due to significant censorship that limits the scope of what it can report.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-0.3)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.7)
Country: China
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: TOTAL OPPRESSION
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
TechNode, established in 2007 by Dr. Gang Lu, is a technology media platform providing insights into China’s tech sector. It operates in both English and Chinese and covers trends, startups, and corporate innovation. TechNode also operates TechNode Global, a pan-Asian tech media and community platform extending its reach across Asia. TechNode operates out of Shanghai, China.
Read our profile on China’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
TechNode is a privately owned company founded and led by Dr. Gang Lu. The company has received funding from investors such as Kairous Capital, Nutty Capital, and SPH Ventures, which aid its operations and expansion efforts. TechNode also generates revenue through donations and subscription services.
Analysis / Bias
TechNode operates within China’s controlled media environment, adhering to state regulations while subtly navigating reporting constraints. This is particularly evident in its handling of sensitive topics. For example, in its 2018 article, “iFlytek removes politically sensitive terms on Android translation app,” TechNode presents the facts surrounding self-censorship by the Chinese company without directly criticizing the government. By highlighting the removal of politically sensitive terms, the article implicitly points to the influence of state control on technology companies, raising awareness of broader issues while avoiding overt confrontation. This delicate balance allows readers to infer the systemic impact of censorship without the platform stepping outside the bounds of permissible discourse.
While the platform refrains from direct criticisms of the state, its reporting choices, such as highlighting the mechanisms and consequences of government influence on companies, demonstrate an ability to raise awareness and inform readers.
In its 2024 article, “Chinese companies take on Tesla’s Full Self-Driving with non-lidar approach, end-to-end AI,” TechNode emphasizes the ambition and innovation of Chinese automakers, such as Xpeng Motors, describing their strategies as “pragmatic yet challenging.” Focusing on Chinese companies’ ability to adapt in the face of competition reflects an underlying narrative of national resilience and innovation, which aligns with a pro-China perspective. The article incorporates a variety of sources, including CNBC, The Motley Fool, Electrek, Weibo, WeChat, and Elon Musk’s posts on X (formerly Twitter). These citations enhance the factual depth of the article.
TechNode’s editorial strategy balances compliance with Chinese regulations and its international connections to deliver nuanced, sometimes critical insights. However, being based in China, they are subject to censorship and hence do not present the full context of their stories.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate TechNode as Least Biased due to its focus on technology and business reporting without direct political commentary. Its reporting is rated as Mixed due to significant censorship that limits the scope of what it can report. (M. Huitsing 01/01/2025)
Source: https://technode.com/
Last Updated on January 1, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources