PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate Scientific European as Mostly Factual and Pro-Science. While the site relies on credible sources, its open-access model and lack of peer review introduce potential conflicts of interest. The content is informative but should be approached with caution, especially when it involves the promotion of new technologies or health innovations.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Scientific European is an open-access science and technology magazine founded in 2017 by Umesh Prasad. The publication aims to simplify and disseminate complex scientific research to a broader audience, covering topics such as space exploration, health, and environmental issues. The platform focuses on presenting scientific advancements in an accessible manner.
Read our profile on UK government influence on media.
Funded by / Ownership:
Scientific European is published by UK EPC LTD, with Umesh Prasad as the Editor-in-Chief. It operates as an open-access scientific magazine. According to its policy page, the site is funded through advertising and subscriptions. It maintains that no external parties can influence editorial content despite the potential for revenue from advertising and other financial streams. The platform claims to ensure that any collaborations or sponsored content are clearly marked to maintain transparency.
Analysis / Bias
Scientific European primarily covers topics related to scientific advancements. For example, the article Search of Life Beyond Earth: Clipper Mission to Europa Launched discusses NASA’s mission to explore Europa, providing detailed information on space exploration while reflecting the publication’s pro-science stance.
Another article, “Hearing Aid Feature” (HAF): The First OTC Hearing Aid Software Receives FDA Authorisation, discusses the FDA approval of over-the-counter hearing aid software. While factually accurate, articles like this may reflect a promotional tone, especially regarding health and technology innovations. Scientific European typically provides direct links to reputable sources at the bottom of its articles, including official press releases from institutions such as NASA, the FDA, and other credible organizations. These links allow readers to verify the claims and further explore the original research or announcements. This practice helps maintain transparency and credibility in their reporting.
In our analysis, we reviewed several articles from Scientific European, and they were sourced thoroughly, with direct references to credible organizations like NASA, ScienceDirect, and the FDA. While this demonstrates strong sourcing practices, the lack of a peer-review process remains a concern. Additionally, its open-access nature raises the potential for promotional content, as the platform could rely on research organizations and sponsorships, which may introduce subtle biases. Despite this, the site maintains transparency by providing verifiable links to authoritative sources.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Scientific European as Mostly Factual and Pro-Science. While the site relies on credible sources, its open-access model and lack of peer review introduce potential conflicts of interest. The content is informative but should be approached with caution, especially when it involves the promotion of new technologies or health innovations. (M. Huitsing 10/23/2024)
Source: https://www.scientificeuropean.co.uk/
Last Updated on October 23, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources