Radio Television Hong Kong – Bias and Credibility

Radio Television Hong Kong is rated Left-Center with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

History

Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK) is Hong Kong’s government-funded public broadcaster. Founded in 1928, it operates radio, television, and digital news services.

RTHK was historically modeled on independent public broadcasters such as the BBC and developed a reputation for investigative reporting and criticism of government officials. Its editorial independence declined sharply after the 2019 protests and the adoption of Hong Kong’s National Security Law in 2020.

Read our profile on Hong Kong’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

RTHK is owned and funded by the Hong Kong government and operates as a government department under the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau. Its charter formally promises editorial independence, accuracy, and impartiality. However, senior management is appointed by the government, and its journalists are subject to civil-service rules and national-security requirements.

Analysis / Bias

RTHK once provided relatively independent scrutiny of Hong Kong’s government. During the 2019 protests, pro-Beijing politicians and police organizations accused it of anti-government bias because of its investigative reports, confrontational interviews, and political satire.

That changed after 2020. The government replaced experienced broadcasting leadership with civil servants, imposed prepublication reviews, removed programs, deleted archived material, and instructed staff to protect national security and identify with China’s national interests. Freedom House described this process as the “gutting” of the broadcaster, while The Wire China reported that RTHK now promotes “patriotic journalism” and follows a pro-Beijing narrative. Freedom House concluded that its editorial autonomy had been severely damaged.

Much of RTHK’s daily reporting remains factually straightforward. For example, Escalating Tensions in the Middle East Prompt the United States to Urge Its Citizens in the Region to Prepare for Evacuation accurately summarizes warnings from American embassies and uses a Reuters photograph.

However, politically sensitive domestic and Chinese stories tend to reflect official government priorities. In Sun Dong Revealed That Li Jiaying Will Have a “Dialogue Between Heaven and Earth” With Primary and Secondary School Students, RTHK presents China’s space program and Hong Kong’s role in the national aerospace strategy entirely through government statements, without independent analysis or critical context.

RTHK generally avoids openly inflammatory language. Its bias is expressed more through story selection, reliance on official sources, patriotic framing, censorship, and the omission of pro-democracy or Beijing-critical perspectives. These problems are especially serious because the broadcaster presents itself as an independent public-service outlet while operating under direct government control.

Failed Fact Checks

• None to date. The greater reliability concern is systematic censorship and omission rather than a large number of demonstrably false individual reports. RTHK frequently publishes accurate basic information, but audiences may not receive a complete or independent account of politically sensitive events.

Overall, we rate Radio Television Hong Kong Left-Center biased and Questionable due to its alignment with the Chinese and Hong Kong governments, documented censorship, and suppression of Beijing-critical perspectives. We rate its factual reporting Mixed because routine news is often accurate, while politically sensitive coverage is compromised by propaganda, selective reporting, and significant omissions. (D. Van Zandt 08/02/2026)

Source: https://news.rthk.hk/

Last Updated on August 2, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources