LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Pride.com as Left Biased due to its advocacy and coverage of LGBTQ+ issues, often framed through a progressive lens. We rate its reporting as Mixed for factuality, as it combines credible references with reliance on social media and informal sources in some articles.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Pride.com is an online publication dedicated to LGBTQ+ news, culture, and entertainment. Its content promotes LGBTQ+ rights, visibility, and acceptance, aligning with progressive and left-leaning values. The website features articles on queer celebrities, lifestyle topics, and advocacy for LGBTQ+ issues, reflecting its commitment to inclusivity and diversity.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
In 2022, Los Angeles-based Pride.com and its affiliated publications—Out, The Advocate, Out Traveler, and Plus—were acquired by Equal Entertainment, leading to the formation of Equal Pride; Pride generates revenue through advertising and subscriptions.
Analysis / Bias
Pride.com focuses on LGBTQ+ issues, blending cultural commentary, personal stories, and news coverage with a distinctly progressive tone. Its editorial stance aligns with advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, often emphasizing humor to engage its audience.
For example, the article “MAGA is furious about viral post saying Republicans’ have two daddies now’ and we’re howling” uses social media reactions to critique political figures such as Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The article humorously frames the topic, resonating with its audience but leaning heavily on social media posts and circular references to its content.
Another article, “Lesbians and Pubic Hair,” focuses on a lighthearted, niche topic within the LGBTQ+ community and uses casual language and user-generated content. (e.g., Reddit discussions) The article’s tone and reliance on informal sources reflect a tabloid approach aimed at entertainment and community engagement rather than in-depth analysis or factual reporting.
These examples demonstrate the range of topics covered by Pride.com, from political satire to community-focused lifestyle content. While some articles rely mostly on social media and circular references, others incorporate external sources.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Pride.com as Left Biased due to its advocacy and coverage of LGBTQ+ issues, often framed through a progressive lens. We rate its reporting as Mixed for factuality, as it combines credible references with reliance on social media and informal sources in some articles. (M. Huitsing 12/26/2024)
Source: https://www.pride.com/
Last Updated on December 26, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources