PoliticusUSA – Bias and Credibility

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal/progressive causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal/progressive causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate PoliticusUSA Left Biased based on strongly progressive story selection, consistently favorable treatment of Democrats, and highly negative framing of Donald Trump and Republican officials. We also rate them High for factual reporting because commentary is generally grounded in identifiable events and credible sources, ownership and funding are transparent, and there are no significant failed fact checks within the current five-year period.

---

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT (6.9)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2009, PoliticusUSA is a political news, commentary, and opinion publication founded by Jason Easley. According to its About page, PoliticusUSA focuses on democracy, civil rights, and government and describes itself as independent of political parties, corporations, and special-interest organizations. Jason Easley owns and operates the publication, with Sarah Jones also contributing political commentary and analysis.

In late 2024, PoliticusUSA moved its publishing operation to Substack and transitioned from an advertising-supported model to a reader-supported newsletter format.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

PoliticusUSA is independently owned and operated by founder Jason Easley. The publication states that it is minority-owned, accepts no corporate or political-party funding, and since moving to Substack is supported entirely through free and paid reader subscriptions rather than advertising.

Analysis / Bias

PoliticusUSA publishes political news and commentary from a strongly progressive perspective, with story selection and headlines consistently favoring Democrats while portraying Donald Trump and Republicans negatively. For example, Republicans Are Begging Billionaires For Bailouts As They See A Blue Wave Wipeout Coming describes Republican candidates as facing a collapse driven by Trump policies and uses openly partisan language throughout.

The tone is frequently even stronger in Trump coverage. Trump Threatens Democrats During Arlington National Cemetery Veterans Day Fiasco mixes reporting on Trump’s remarks with mocking commentary about his behavior and competence. Likewise, Trump Destroys What Is Left Of His Presidency By Naming Stephen Miller Chief Of Staff describes Miller as a “far right wing zealot” and frames the appointment as an effort to destroy the remainder of Trump’s presidency.

Despite its strong ideological framing, PoliticusUSA generally bases its commentary on identifiable events, direct quotations, video, public statements, polling, and reporting from established news organizations. The publication openly identifies itself as commentary and opinion and is transparent about its progressive focus on democracy and civil rights. Its persistent pro-Democratic story selection and highly negative framing of Republicans support a strong Left rating.

Failed Fact Checks

• A review of major fact-checking organizations did not reveal significant failed fact checks attributed to PoliticusUSA within the current five-year review period.

Overall, we rate PoliticusUSA Left Biased based on strongly progressive story selection, consistently favorable treatment of Democrats, and highly negative framing of Donald Trump and Republican officials. We also rate them High for factual reporting because commentary is generally grounded in identifiable events and credible sources, ownership and funding are transparent, and there are no significant failed fact checks within the current five-year period. (5/15/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 11/14/2026)

Source: https://www.politicususa.com/