LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Planet: Critical as Far Left-Biased due to its focus on progressive issues and critiques of systemic structures. We rate its reporting as Mixed, acknowledging that while the information is generally accurate and well-researched, there are instances of unverified claims and one-sided reporting.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.8)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Mimimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Planet: Critical is a journalistic platform founded by Rachel Donald that investigates global crises and explores solutions. It features a podcast and newsletter that delve into topics such as climate change, energy, economics, and politics, aiming to connect various disciplines to reveal comprehensive insights into current global challenges. According to its about page, “Planet: Critical is journalism for a world in crisis, connecting the dots of science, art, language, politics, media, philosophy, and power to reveal the big picture.”
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Owned and operated by Rachel Donald, Planet: Critical is a reader-supported platform that relies on subscriptions and donations to sustain its operations.
Analysis / Bias
Planet: Critical exhibits a Left Bias, focusing on progressive issues like climate change, environmental justice, and systemic critiques of modernity. For instance, articles such as “Greenwashed: From pipeline to catwalk to policy” critically examine corporate sustainability practices, reflecting a progressive stance. The platform’s content is generally well-researched and features interviews with experts, providing in-depth analysis. However, the selection of topics and framing align with progressive viewpoints, which may influence the presentation of information.
Editorially, opinion pieces feature very loaded language that is highly critical of Donald Trump, like this The Rapist in the Oval Office. Besides labeling Trump a rapist, for which he has never been criminally tried, the core arguments also contain inaccuracies and unverified claims, such as implying direct collusion between Trump and Putin to destabilize American democracy without solid evidence. In general, Planet: Critical exhibits a far-left bias and occasionally makes unverified claims.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Planet: Critical as Far Left-Biased due to its focus on progressive issues and critiques of systemic structures. We rate its reporting as Mixed, acknowledging that while the information is generally accurate and well-researched, there are instances of unverified claims and one-sided reporting. (D. Van Zandt 12/02/2024)
Source: https://www.planetcritical.com/
Last Updated on December 2, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources