RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Pirate Wires as Right biased due to its frequent criticism of progressive policies. We rate its factual reporting as Mixed, as it relies on opinionated framing, provocative headlines, and speculative arguments rather than consistently well-sourced journalism.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.6)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.8)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Pirate Wires is a media platform founded in 2020 by Mike Solana, a tech industry insider and partner at Founders Fund. The site covers technology, politics, and culture, often challenging mainstream narratives and critiquing government regulations, progressive policies, and media bias. Pirate Wires positions itself as a counterbalance to legacy media and Silicon Valley groupthink, offering analysis from a libertarian-leaning, pro-tech perspective. The publication does not publicly disclose a headquarters and operates as a digital-first outlet.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Mike Solana, a venture capitalist and tech media entrepreneur, owns Pirate Wires and serves as its editor-in-chief. He is also the Chief Marketing Officer at Founders Fund, the venture capital firm co-founded by Peter Thiel, aligning him with Silicon Valley’s libertarian-leaning, pro-free-market, and anti-regulation advocates. The platform generates revenue through subscriptions, advertising, and sponsorships, though it does not publicly disclose detailed financial information.
Analysis / Bias
Pirate Wires leans right-wing and anti-establishment, often framing progressive policies and government regulation as threats to innovation and individual freedom. Its coverage often favors the tech industry, advocates for free markets, and opposes centralized authority, often using provocative headlines to convey its critiques. For example, the article “Listen Up, Bezos: Shut Up and Pay Me” takes an aggressive approach toward Amazon’s wage policies, while “Sucks to EU” mocks European regulatory measures. The language is highly informal, provocative, and laced with sarcasm, which aligns with Pirate Wires’ broader editorial style. The article uses mocking rhetoric, exaggerated phrasing, and conversational snark to frame the EU as an overreaching bureaucratic entity that stifles free speech and innovation.
For example, phrases like “Olaf, baby,” and “Americans want to shitpost in peace” add a dismissive, irreverent tone, portraying European governance as rigid and authoritarian while positioning American values as freer and more rebellious. This framing doesn’t engage in serious policy discussion but trivializes EU regulations through ridicule and oversimplification.
Some pieces lean into absurd or exaggerated proposals, such as “Let’s Turn Guantanamo Into the New Hong Kong,” which suggests repurposing Guantanamo Bay as a free-market tech hub. While the piece is partly speculative, it illustrates Pirate Wires’ tendency to blend serious policy critiques with provocative or unconventional ideas.
Pirate Wires often prioritizes editorializing over facts, reinforcing its ideological perspective. The site does not heavily rely on investigative journalism, often concluding opinionated commentary and industry perspectives rather than objective reporting.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Pirate Wires as Right biased due to its frequent criticism of progressive policies. We rate its factual reporting as Mixed, as it relies on opinionated framing, provocative headlines, and speculative arguments rather than consistently well-sourced journalism. (M. Huitsing 03/02/2025)
Source: https://www.piratewires.com/
Last Updated on March 2, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources