LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Parents.com as left-center biased, showing a slight liberal bias due to its positive framing of certain public figures and topics. We also rate them as factually mixed due to occasional lapses in factual accuracy and poor sourcing practices, such as using outdated references.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.2)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.2)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Parents magazine has been providing parenting advice since 1926. It is part of Dotdash Meredith, a publishing family with other well-known brands. The magazine covers many parenting topics, offering guidance from conception through raising teenagers. Parent Magazine is based in New York City.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
People Inc., formerly Dotdash-Meredith, a major digital and print media company, owns Parents. The publication is funded through advertisements and partnerships.
Analysis / Bias
Before presenting our analysis, we reviewed several articles from Parents.com, which cover various topics related to parenting, pregnancy, and child health. Regarding sourcing, the site generally researches and cites sources to support its content. However, in the article “Is It Safe To Drink Energy Drinks During Pregnancy?” the site frequently uses internal links instead of directly citing primary sources. For example, when stating that “experts recommend avoiding energy drinks like Red Bull while pregnant because of the high caffeine content,” the article links to another internal piece, “Are Energy Drinks Good for Kids?” This linked article is not directly related to the statement about pregnancy.
Additionally, the site often references outdated studies, such as research from 2013 in a 2024 article. This reliance on older sources diminishes the accuracy and relevance of their health content, as citing a 2013 study on caffeine consumption during pregnancy may not reflect the latest guidelines and findings, potentially leading to misinformation.
Another article we analyzed, “Ms. Rachel Designed Her New Toys To ‘Grow’ With Your Child and ‘Last Longer Than 2 Days'”, is written with a promotional tone, focusing on the positive aspects of Ms. Rachel’s new toy line and her influence on child development. It emphasizes the care and attention to detail put into the toys, aiming to position them as must-have items for parents who trust Ms. Rachel’s educational content. The article seems to be part of a broader promotional effort. Still, it does not disclose whether it is sponsored or part of a partnership, which may affect the perceived transparency and objectivity of the content, similar to another article from 2023, which also promoted the initial launch of Ms. Rachel’s toy line with a similar focus.
Lastly, regarding bias, while Parents.com generally does not publish overtly political content, the article “Exclusive: Michelle Obama on ‘The Light We Carry'” reflects a positive framing of Michelle Obama, focusing on her wisdom and resilience, which suggests a progressive-liberal bias, which is consistent with the content we’ve analyzed.
Additionally, their About page mentions a commitment to inclusivity and diversity, further supporting this editorial stance. Typically, Parents.com focuses on practical, evidence-based parenting advice. However, our analysis found that some content, such as outdated references and promotional articles, may not fully align with their claimed standards of factual accuracy.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the last 5 years
Overall, we rate Parents.com as left-center biased, showing a slight liberal bias due to its positive framing of certain public figures and topics. We also rate them as factually mixed due to occasional lapses in factual accuracy and poor sourcing practices, such as using outdated references. (M. Huitsing 08/21/2024) Updated (08/02/2025)
Sources: https://www.parents.com/
Last Updated on August 2, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources