Next Observer – Bias and Credibility

Next Observer - Pro Science - Credible

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

Update: this source is no longer online

Factual Reporting: HIGH


Founded in 2018, Next Observer is a science news curation website. Next Observer does not have an about page, nor any names associated with the website.

Funded by / Ownership

The website does not list ownership and they are funded through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Next Observer selects and republishes popular science stories with minimal bias. The stories come from credible science sources such as university studies, research, and known pro-science magazines. The content is easy to read and accessible to laypersons. This is a pro-science source.



Last Updated on June 28, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: