RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate N-tv as Right-Center biased based on some opinion pieces, such as articles on centrist or center-left figures like Olaf Scholz, that exhibit critical framing. We also rate it Mostly Factual for accuracy due to poor sourcing practices.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: Germany
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
N-tv, accessible at n-tv.de, is a German television news channel and online news platform founded in 1992. It provides 24-hour news coverage, including live reporting, documentaries, and analysis on politics, business, and other current affairs. As part of the RTL Group, n-tv aims to serve a broad audience interested in national and international news.
Read our profile on Germany’s media and government
Funded by / Ownership
N-tv is owned by RTL Deutschland, a subsidiary of RTL Group, which is part of Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA. RTL Group is one of Europe’s leading media companies, and this ownership provides N-TV with significant resources, shaping its editorial policies within the framework of mainstream European media. The Mohn family has significant influence over RTL Deutschland through their ownership of the Bertelsmann Group, which ultimately controls RTL Group. Advertisement generates revenue.
Analysis / Bias
N-tv generally provides balanced reporting, but some opinion pieces exhibit strong critical framing and selective language choices that may influence readers’ perceptions of political figures. In the article Deutschlandtempo? Nicht mit Scholz, the author critiques German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s approach to addressing the current political crisis in Germany. The title, “German Speed? Not with Scholz,” immediately sets a critical tone, suggesting that Scholz is not acting swiftly or effectively to address urgent issues.
The article uses strong, emotionally loaded language such as “power vacuum” and “the Chancellor without power,” portraying Scholz as passive and indecisive. It criticizes Scholz for setting the date for a vote of confidence as January 15, framing this as “much too late,” especially in light of the country’s political instability and urgent legislative needs. The article lists specific policies and reforms that are on hold, such as hospital reform and cyber defense laws, implying that Scholz’s delay is directly harming Germany’s ability to govern effectively. This framing emphasizes the Chancellor’s perceived lack of urgency and responsibility, which could sway readers toward a negative view of his leadership.
The article does not provide significant alternative perspectives or potential reasons for Scholz’s decision-making, such as administrative requirements or strategic considerations, which might have offered a more balanced portrayal.
In contrast, the article Trump gibt Hörer bei Selenskyj-Gespräch plötzlich an Musk reports on an unusual event involving newly elected U.S. President Donald Trump, who purportedly handed the phone to Elon Musk during a conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. This piece maintains a neutral, factual tone. It describes Trump’s unpredictable behavior without editorializing, focusing on the details of the interaction. This article aligns with N-tv’s objective reporting standards, though it primarily relies on secondary sources without extensive firsthand details or quotes, limiting the depth of context.
Generally, N-tv’s content includes both balanced reporting and opinion pieces that employ framing and selective language choices, particularly toward centrist or center-left political figures like Scholz. While most articles maintain neutrality, some opinion pieces may subtly influence reader perceptions through critical phrasing.
Further, like the Scholz article, it lacks direct quotes or external links, making it difficult to confirm the context or source of the information. The article cites sources like Axios without hyperlinks or direct citations, limiting transparency and making it harder for readers to verify information independently. This reliance on unlinked references places trust in editorial interpretation rather than verifiable sourcing.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate N-tv as Right-Center biased based on some opinion pieces, such as articles on centrist or center-left figures like Olaf Scholz, that exhibit critical framing. We also rate it Mostly Factual for accuracy due to poor sourcing practices. (M. Huitsing 11/09/2024)
Source: https://www.n-tv.de/
Last Updated on November 9, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources