RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate MLI as Right-Center biased for its conservative framing of government policy, social issues, and cultural critiques. It is rated Mostly Factual due to its use of credible sources but with limited donor transparency and some instances of leaning away from the scientific consensus on climate change.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: Canada
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI), based in Ottawa, is a Canadian non-profit that promotes policy solutions rooted in conservative values. MLI frequently explores national security, economic policy, and social issues, aiming to impact Canadian policy debates with a free-market, traditionalist perspective. The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) was founded in 2010 by Brian Lee Crowley, who is currently serving as its Managing Director.
Read our profile on the Canadian government’s influence on media.
Funded by / Ownership
As a non-profit organization, MLI relies on private donations, foundation grants, and corporate sponsorships. The institute does not disclose specific donor names on its website, which limits transparency regarding potential financial influences on its research and publications. However, MLI publishes an annual report with general financial updates but lacks specific donor details. Public filings on ProPublica also confirm MLI’s tax-exempt status under EIN 980578530. However, there is no detailed list of corporate donors.
Analysis / Bias
MLI has a right-leaning bias, often supporting conservative and market-oriented views in its reports and commentary. For instance, in its Telecoms section, MLI republishes content like “When it comes to telecoms, does Canada need to get over its foreign ownership phobia?” by Peter Menzies, originally published in The Hub. This piece argues against Canada’s restrictive foreign ownership policies in telecom, reflecting MLI’s skepticism toward government intervention.
In social policy, MLI’s Gender Identity section features articles from outlets like the Washington Examiner, Newsweek, and The Times critiquing progressive policies on gender and identity. This consistent selection of sources with conservative leanings reinforces MLI’s ideological stance, particularly regarding issues of limited regulation and cautious approaches to cultural changes, although they claim to be non-partisan.
Additionally, MLI’s stance on climate change includes perspectives that may appear to downplay its urgency. In an article titled “The warming climate is making cooler countries like Canada more appealing to tourists,” co-authored by Ken Coates and Carin Holroyd, the authors discuss potential economic benefits of climate warming for Canada, such as increased tourism in northern regions. While this article doesn’t dismiss climate change directly, its focus on potential advantages contrasts with the global urgency often highlighted in mainstream climate reporting. This framing supports MLI’s selective emphasis on issues through a conservative lens that may prioritize economic opportunity over environmental impact.
These examples collectively illustrate MLI’s Right-leaning bias by selectively amplifying market-driven, conservative viewpoints across a range of policy issues.
Regarding sourcing, as we mentioned above, MLI frequently republishes content from conservative-leaning publications, such as The Washington Examiner, Newsweek, The Times, and The Hub. This approach allows MLI to reinforce its ideological stance with articles like Eric Kaufmann’s “No, we haven’t reached ‘peak woke,’ it’s going mainstream” from The Times, critiquing cultural progressivism. Such reprints contribute to a more ideologically selective range of sources that align with MLI’s conservative framing on social and regulatory issues.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate MLI as Right-Center biased for its conservative framing of government policy, social issues, and cultural critiques. It is rated Mostly Factual due to its use of credible sources but with limited donor transparency and some instances of leaning away from the scientific consensus on climate change. (M. Huitsing 10/30/2024)
Source: https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/
Last Updated on October 30, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources