LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
- Overall, we rate ITIF as Least Biased based on its technocratic, pro-innovation stance, support for strategic public investment, and occasional criticism of conservative policy decisions. We rate it High for factual reporting due to its research-based methodology, proper sourcing, and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (-1.8)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a Washington, D.C.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit think tank founded in 2006. According to its About page, ITIF focuses on science, technology, and innovation policy, aiming to promote productivity growth, competitiveness, and economic development through pro-innovation public policy. It has been recognized by the University of Pennsylvania’s Global Go To Think Tank Index as a leading science and technology policy think tank.
ITIF houses multiple policy centers covering data innovation, clean energy, life sciences, industrial strategy, competition policy, and international competitiveness. It positions itself as nonpartisan and grounded in research integrity and analytical rigor.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
ITIF is supported by corporations, charitable foundations, and individual donors. It has received funding from technology-sector firms and industry groups, leading some critics to characterize it as aligned with large technology companies. ITIF maintains that it operates independently and adheres to an internal code of ethics. It has earned a Candid Seal of Transparency and a three-star Charity Navigator rating.
Analysis / Bias
ITIF generally advocates pro-innovation, pro-market, and tech-positive policy positions. Its work often supports limited but strategic government intervention to promote innovation and global competitiveness.
For example, in The Digital Marriage Divide: Ranking States’ Online Services for Tying the Knot, ITIF evaluates digital government services using a structured methodology and objective criteria, presenting policy recommendations without partisan framing.
In contrast, Canada Should Hire Scientists Trump Fires contains more pointed political language, criticizing Donald Trump’s science policies while advocating for Canadian policy reform. While the tone is sharper, the argument centers on research funding and competitiveness rather than partisan ideology.
ITIF frequently defends large technology firms against aggressive antitrust or regulatory proposals, often criticizing both progressive “techlash” narratives and right-wing protectionism. Its positions sometimes align with business interests and market-oriented policy solutions, but it also supports public investment in R&D and industrial policy.
Overall, ITIF demonstrates a technocratic, growth-oriented perspective that leans slightly left-of-center on industrial policy and public investment, while remaining market-friendly and often bipartisan in engagement.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate ITIF as Least Biased based on its technocratic, pro-innovation stance, support for strategic public investment, and occasional criticism of conservative policy decisions. We rate it High for factual reporting due to its research-based methodology, proper sourcing, and a clean fact-check record. (D.Van Zandt 02/21/2026)
Last Updated on February 21, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources