LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate IndieWire as Left-Center biased due to its progressive focus on cultural and political coverage. We also rate its reporting as high in factuality for its credible sourcing, particularly within its independent film and television niche.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
IndieWire, founded in 1996, is a key platform for independent cinema and television. It provides industry news, reviews, interviews, and opinion pieces for creators, critics, and audiences interested in emerging media. IndieWire is headquartered in New York.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
IndieWire is owned by Penske Media Corporation (PMC), which acquired it in 2016. PMC is a major media company that owns various publications, including Variety and Rolling Stone. IndieWire generates revenue through advertising, including display ads and sponsored content, and affiliate marketing, where it earns commissions by promoting products or services. Additionally, as part of Penske Media Corporation, IndieWire may benefit from shared corporate resources and revenue streams.
Analysis / Bias
IndieWire primarily covers independent film and entertainment, publishing a mix of news, reviews, and opinion pieces. Its reviews often critique films based on their artistic and narrative execution. For example, the review of A Complete Unknown describes the Bob Dylan biopic as overly formulaic and notes its lack of engagement with Dylan’s political context, reflecting the publication’s analytical style in film critique.
In political coverage, IndieWire frequently connects media and policy decisions to broader cultural implications. Articles such as “How the Trump Administration Will Impact Public Media & Documentaries” emphasize nonprofit executives’ concerns regarding potential funding cuts to public broadcasting under the Trump administration. The use of emotionally charged language, such as “scary,” reflects IndieWire’s framing, which emphasizes the potential risks while offering a perspective aligned with progressive values in support of public media.
Regarding sourcing, IndieWire generally references credible sources, including the Wall Street Journal and cpb.org, to provide context and factual grounding for its claims. While these sources lend credibility to the piece, the article’s framing, including its emphasis on emotionally charged language, reflects IndieWire’s editorial perspective.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate IndieWire as Left-Center biased due to its progressive focus on cultural and political coverage. We also rate its reporting as high in factuality for its credible sourcing, particularly within its independent film and television niche. (M. Huitsing 12/10/2024)
Source: https://www.indiewire.com/
Last Updated on December 10, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources