IFL Science

Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.



Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: United Kingdom
World Press Freedom Rank: UK 40/180


IFL Science, short for I F#cking Love Science, began as a Facebook page in 2012. It then became a popular website that publishes light popular science stories. The website does not have an about page, however their Facebook page simply reads “The lighter side of science.” The founder and editor of IFLS is Elise Andrews who holds a Bachelors of Science from the University of Sheffield.

Funded by / Ownership

The website is owned by Elise Andrews and is funded through a combination of advertising and sale of merchandise from an online store.

Analysis / Bias

In review, IFL Science is challenging to place into a category. For the most part the information contained on the website is pro-science and sourced fairly well to credible science or other popular science sources. However, IFLS has also published false information that falls into the realm of pseudoscience. Finally, IFLS has strong political opinions that align with the left such as this: Here’s A List Of All The Science That Donald Trump Denies: Second Edition or Science Knowledge Has Almost No Effect On Republican Beliefs, According To Survey. In general, a survey of stories that relate to politics shows a left leaning bias in story selection and political association. 

When it comes to science, IFLS is generally in support of the consensus with Vaccinations, Climate Change and GMO’s. However, some stories are ridiculous and speculative such as this: Pieces Of A “UFO” Fell From The Sky And Landed In Remote Cambodian Village.

A factual search reveals that IFL Science has published some unproven and false claims

Overall, we rate IFL Science a Mild Pseudoscience website based on publication of unproven and misleading information related to science. We would also like to clarify that most information on this website is scientifically sound, however, caution is needed based on a track record of occasionally publishing misinformation. (12/12/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 11/8/2018)


Conspiracy Level: IFL Science
Pseudoscience Level: IFL Science




We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.

Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC