RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Hungarian Conservative as Right-Biased due to consistent topic selection and framing aligned with Hungarian government and conservative positions, with sparse use of balancing sources in the samples reviewed. We rate its reporting Mostly Factual: claims are typically attributed and consistent with the outlet’s stated perspective.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT (5.9)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.0)
Country: Hungary
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Launched in 2021, Hungarian Conservative is an English-language magazine that publishes articles on political, philosophical, and cultural issues from a conservative perspective. The outlet identifies its publisher as BL Nonprofit Kft. The “About” page frames the project as a platform to share Hungarian conservatism with international audiences.
Read our profile on Hungary’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Hungarian Conservative states that it is published by BL Nonprofit Kft. and sponsored by the Batthyány Lajos Foundation. BL Nonprofit appears again in the site’s General Terms (corporate details and address), and while the site does not list individual donors, the sponsor’s identity and the publisher’s Budapest registration are disclosed.
Analysis / Bias
A review of its coverage reveals a consistent reliance on government-forward narratives and limited engagement with counter-voices. In “Orbán Urges Europe to ‘Turn Back from a Dead End’ on War Policy,” the article centers Orbán’s criticism of EU policy and presents his claims at length with limited external corroboration or counter-voices, resulting in a government-forward narrative. The tone is reportorial, but the balance relies mostly on the prime minister’s interview, rather than independent documentation or opposition perspectives.
In “Zelenskyy’s Inner Circle Rocked by Massive Corruption Probe,” the piece elevates allegations tied to businessman Timur Mindich and Ukraine’s energy sector, positioning the scandal within a broader skepticism toward Kyiv. The article cites Euronews and Politico Europe
In the opinion piece, “A Civilizational Ally and Strategic Connector: Hungary and the US in a Trans-Caspian Strategy,” the site advances a civilizational foreign-policy frame and argues for Hungary’s role as a bridge in U.S.–Trans-Caspian dynamics. The essay foregrounds sovereignty, energy security, and Christian-civilizational identity—recurring themes for the outlet—and makes the strategic case without engaging counter-arguments common in mainstream transatlantic analysis. The article cites Reuters and official state sources. Taken together, these examples show conservative-national framing, limited inclusion of adversarial or third-party expertise, even when headlines remain neutral.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years.
Overall, we rate the Hungarian Conservative as Right-Biased due to consistent topic selection and framing aligned with Hungarian government and conservative positions, with sparse use of balancing sources in the samples reviewed. We rate its reporting Mostly Factual: claims are typically attributed and consistent with the outlet’s stated perspective. (M. Huitsing (11/23/2025)
Source: https://www.hungarianconservative.com/
Last Updated on November 23, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources