QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Harbingers Daily as Right Biased due to its heavy reliance on conservative Christian perspectives and selective reporting of events through a biblical prophecy lens. We rate its reporting as questionable and low factual based on promoting conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, poor sources and a lack of transparency.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (9.1)
Factual Reporting: LOW (8.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Harbingers Daily, founded in 2014, is a Christian news website that publishes articles on political and social issues through a biblical prophecy lens. The site frequently covers topics related to eschatology (the study of end times) and features opinion pieces from pastors and religious commentators. The organization does not specify a central headquarters on its website.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The ownership of the website is not clearly disclosed. Revenue is generated through donations.
Analysis / Bias
Harbingers frequently cover topics related to religious freedom, abortion, LGBTQ+ issues, and perceived threats to Christianity, often aligning with right-wing political narratives.
Articles often frame issues in a way that supports conservative Christian perspectives. For example, in the article “Europe Shook After Its Erosion Of Fundamental Freedoms Is Placed In The Spotlight” the author emphasizes concerns about declining religious liberties but does not provide a balanced perspective by including counterarguments or data showing how religious freedoms might still be protected in Europe. Instead, it presents only one side of the debate, focusing on a perceived growing hostility toward Christianity to mobilize Christian readers against societal shifts.
Similarly, in the article “3 Biggest Lies About COVID-19 Have All Been Exposed—But Here’s Why Globalist Powerbrokers Can’t Let It Die,” the site uses conspiratorial language, portraying public health policies as orchestrated deceptions by “globalist powerbrokers.” This framing fosters skepticism toward government institutions and scientific authorities.
Additionally, the article “Green Card Holders Don’t Have A Right To Incite Violence And Celebrate Murder” selectively focuses on crimes committed by immigrants, reinforcing anti-immigration narratives while omitting broader discussions on free speech laws and legal protections for all residents.
The site’s coverage of LGBTQ+ issues, as seen in its “Homosexuality” section, consistently portrays LGBTQ+ identities as immoral and contrary to biblical teachings. Articles within this section frequently frame LGBTQ+ rights as a moral decline in society, often linking them to broader cultural degradation. The framing relies heavily on scripture and religious doctrine. The website cites like-minded conservative outlets, religious leaders, and alternative news sources.
Failed Fact Checks
- None by a third party fact checker. However, conspiracy theories and pseudoscience are consistently promoted.
Overall, we rate Harbingers Daily as Right Biased due to its heavy reliance on conservative Christian perspectives and selective reporting of events through a biblical prophecy lens. We rate its reporting as questionable and low factual based on promoting conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, poor sources and a lack of transparency. (M. Huitsing 03/14/2025)
Source: https://harbingersdaily.com/
Last Updated on March 14, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

