Globe Terminator – Bias and Credibility

Globe Terminator - Conspiracy - Fake News - Conservative - Not Credibleglobeterminator.com - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Globe Terminator as a conspiracy/pseudoscience source due to its promotion of flat Earth theories, rejection of established scientific principles, and reliance on inflammatory rhetoric. The site’s misrepresentation of scientific tools and its ad hominem attacks on scientists further detract from its credibility.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (5.0)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0)
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Globe Terminator is a website operated by an individual known as “Quantum Eraser” (John), dedicated to promoting flat Earth theories and disputing mainstream scientific principles. The site features sections such as “Flat Earth Proofs” and “Proofs of the Creator,” focusing on challenging the heliocentric model. It is not clear where this website originates.

Funded by / Ownership

The ownership and funding of globeterminator.com are not explicitly disclosed on the website. The site is operated by an individual referred to as “Quantum Eraser” (John), as mentioned on the “About Me” page.  

Analysis / Bias

Globe Terminator heavily promotes flat Earth theories while rejecting established scientific evidence. A prominent argument on the site involves using sextants to claim that “elevation angles” cannot be measured on a curved Earth, misrepresenting how navigation tools function (Sextant Analysis). The site frequently uses aggressive rhetoric, as seen on its “Pretender Clown Liars” page, where mainstream scientists are labeled with derogatory names like “BallTards” and “Dr. Danny Faulkner Falls Flat” (Pretender Clown Liars). The language is inflammatory and undermines any claims of scientific credibility.

The website also includes sensational statements, such as declaring the “official end” of the heliocentric model and dismissing established science as part of a “Spinning Space Monkey Religion.” These positions align closely with conspiracy theory rhetoric, prioritizing provocation over factual analysis. Despite frequent references to prominent scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson, there is no evidence that these individuals support flat Earth theories. On the contrary, Neil deGrasse Tyson is a vocal advocate for science communication and has explicitly addressed and debunked flat Earth claims in public forums and media appearances. This is a common tactic in pseudoscience or conspiracy theory communities, where prominent figures are sometimes misrepresented or taken out of context to support alternative narratives.

Failed Fact Checks

  • There are no documented failed fact checks for Globe Terminator by International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)-approved organizations. However, the site’s reliance on debunked theories and its misrepresentation of scientific principles suggest a lack of factual accuracy.

Overall, we rate Globe Terminator as a conspiracy/pseudoscience source due to its promotion of flat Earth theories, rejection of established scientific principles, and reliance on inflammatory rhetoric. The site’s misrepresentation of scientific tools and its ad hominem attacks on scientists further detract from its credibility. (M. Huitsing 01/15/2025)



Source: https://globeterminator.com/

Last Updated on January 15, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: