Fleming-Method – Bias and Credibility

Fleming-Method - Conspiracy - Fake News - Conservative - Not CredibleFleming Method - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Fleming-Method as a very low factual conspiracy and pseudoscience website based on a range of controversial, scientifically dubious claims about COVID-19 and vaccines, which are not supported by the consensus of science or regulatory authorities.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.5)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

The Fleming-Method website is associated with Dr. Richard M. Fleming, who holds multiple degrees (PhD, MD, JD). The website primarily focuses on health-related topics, with a strong emphasis on COVID-19, its treatment, and related vaccine analysis. It includes sections on the use of the Fleming Method for studying COVID-19 infection severity and treatment responses, as well as investigations into the effects of various COVID-19 vaccines​​​.

The Food & Drug Administration in 2009 barred Dr. Richard Fleming from working with anyone seeking FDA approval of a drug or medicine, citing his conviction on federal fraud charges: Doctor Sentenced in Health Care Fraud Scheme.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Dr. Fleming owns the website. Revenue is generated through the self-promotion of his method.

Analysis / Bias

The Fleming Method is a technique developed by Dr. Richard M. Fleming for measuring changes in tissue to identify infection and inflammation/blood clotting, particularly in the context of COVID-19. This method involves the analysis of metabolic and regional blood flow differences (RBFDs) in tissue. Dr. Fleming has used it to study over 1800 people infected with SARS-CoV-2, claiming to assess the severity of their COVID-19 disease and their responses to various treatments, including controversial ones like hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin​.

The Fleming-Method website exhibits a clear bias towards unconventional and scientifically unsupported views on COVID-19 and vaccines. For example:

  • COVID-19 Treatment Claims: The site claims to use the Fleming Method to study COVID-19 treatment responses, including controversial treatments like hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, and reports varying degrees of success​. Randomized controlled trials — the highest standard of evidence — have found that hydroxychloroquine isn’t beneficial in treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
  • Bioweapon Theory: The website entertains the possibility of COVID-19 being a bioweapon and suggests that Dr. Fleming possesses evidence to support this theory, which is a claim not supported by mainstream scientific consensus​. 
  • Vaccine Analysis: The site conducts its own investigation into the Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen vaccines, claiming to find harmful effects on human blood and even suggests the presence of substances like graphene oxide, which is a claim not corroborated by any significant scientific research or regulatory body​.

In general, the Fleming-Method website promotes disinformation related to COVID-19 and its associated vaccines. Furthermore, as of 2023, Dr. Fleming is still barred from working with anyone associated with the FDA: Richard M. Fleming; Denial of Hearing on Application for Termination of Debarment.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate the Fleming-Method as a very low factual conspiracy and pseudoscience website based on a range of controversial, scientifically dubious claims about COVID-19 and vaccines, which are not supported by the consensus of science or regulatory authorities. (D. Van Zandt 11/26/2023) Updated (11/04/2025)

Source: https://www.flemingmethod.com/

Last Updated on November 4, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: