---

RIGHT BIAS

History

Fair Play for Women (FPFW) was founded in 2017 as an informal discussion group focused on opposing transgender inclusion in women’s spaces, such as sports, prisons, and employment. It officially restructured under the leadership of Dr. Nicola Williams in 2018, positioning itself as a campaign group for “sex-based rights.” Despite presenting itself as a women’s rights advocacy organization, FPFW is widely regarded as an anti-transgender inclusion group. Its name is potentially misleading, as its campaigns often frame transgender inclusion as a threat to women’s safety and fairness. According to their own 2023 review, FPFW has focused on lobbying against policies like Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill, influencing sports federations to exclude transgender athletes from female categories, and campaigning for stricter definitions of “biological sex” in UK law.

Read our profile on United Kingdom Government and Media.

Funded by / Ownership

Fair Play for Women is a nonprofit organization funded through donations from supporters who share its views. The organization does not disclose detailed financial information or major backers. It operates largely through volunteer efforts and frequently runs crowdfunding campaigns, particularly for legal challenges related to transgender inclusion.

Dr. Nicola Williams serves as the director and official spokeswoman of Fair Play for Women. The website doesn’t mention any medical background or training, so it’s safe to assume that she holds a doctorate in a related field within the social sciences or law rather than medicine. While the site doesn’t explicitly state she is the owner, she is the most prominent figure in the organization’s leadership. Fair Play for Women is registered as a nonprofit, but further details on its official registration with the UK Charity Commission or similar authorities are not provided.

Analysis / Bias

Fair Play for Women often frames transgender inclusion as harmful to women’s rights. The organization’s articles consistently portray transgender women as a threat to the fairness, safety, and privacy of women and girls, using selective evidence and emotionally charged arguments to reinforce this narrative.

For example, in the article “Judicial review ruling confirms trans rights do conflict with women’s rights,” the group argues that housing transgender women in women’s prisons endanger female prisoners. The article selectively references incidents involving violent transgender offenders, presenting these cases as representative of all transgender prisoners. The broader context, including risk assessment procedures and the experiences of nonviolent transgender prisoners, is omitted, leading to a skewed portrayal.

Similarly, in “Half of all transgender prisoners are sex offenders or dangerous category A inmates,” the organization critiques prison policies in England and Wales, stating that allowing transgender women in female prisons compromises safety. Although the article links to sources such as the BBC, it relies heavily on circular referencing within its own site to reinforce its claims. This practice undermines the credibility of its sourcing, as it often fails to provide balanced perspectives or independent verification of its assertions.

Another recurring theme is opposition to transgender athletes in women’s sports. Articles like “How trans inclusion in sport is harming women and girls” use anecdotal evidence and anonymous personal testimonies to support their claims, particularly regarding transgender inclusion in sports. These testimonies, collected from around 50 individuals across 25 sports, are presented without independent verification, limiting their credibility and transparency.

Fair Play for Women uses selective referencing and circular citations to bolster its arguments. While the site occasionally links to mainstream sources such as the BBC, these references are used selectively to support its gender-critical stance. Many articles rely on internal references to other Fair Play for Women content, creating a feedback loop that reinforces their narrative without engaging with external or opposing viewpoints. This approach limits the reliability and objectivity of their reporting.

Failed Fact Checks

• None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Fair Play for Women as Right-Biased for advocating policies that prioritize biological sex over gender identity, reflecting traditional, right-leaning perspectives on sex and gender, which align more with conservative ideologies. We also rate its reporting as Factually Mixed due to its reliance on anecdotal evidence, selective sourcing, and lack of independent verification for many of its claims. (M. Huitsing 01/26/2025)

Source: https://fairplayforwomen.com/

Last Updated on January 26, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check

---

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation

---

---

---

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources