LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Factkeepers as Left Biased due to its consistent advocacy for progressive policies, strong opposition to conservative figures, and emotionally charged editorial content. We rate them Mostly Factual because, while they generally source information reliably, their strong editorial tone, lack of opposing viewpoints, and frequent blending of commentary with reporting reduce overall neutrality. Factkeepers primarily functions as a progressive commentary and watchdog platform.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.8)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.2)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Factkeepers is a digital media site founded by Steven J. Newcomb, a veteran publisher and editor. According to their About Us page, the site’s mission is to serve as “guardians of the truth” by exposing falsehoods and promoting accountability in public life. Launched in response to rising concerns about misinformation, Factkeepers focuses heavily on American politics, climate change, civil rights, and social justice issues. The organization’s stated goals in their rationale section frame journalism as a moral obligation to confront disinformation and protect democracy.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Factkeepers is independently owned and operated by Steven J. Newcomb. The site sustains its operations through voluntary reader donations, as outlined on their Support Factkeepers page. Factkeepers does not use traditional advertising, instead relying on direct contributions.
Analysis / Bias
Factkeepers demonstrates a strong progressive editorial stance throughout its content, consistently advocating for liberal policies and viewpoints. Articles frequently use emotionally charged language and portray conservative politicians in an overwhelmingly negative light. For example, the article “Ron DeSantis Hates Education and Is Doing All He Can to Destroy It” frames DeSantis’ educational policies as a deliberate attack on democracy without offering neutral or opposing viewpoints. Contributions from figures like Thom Hartmann, a well-known progressive commentator, further reinforce the site’s ideological slant by describing Republican immigration policies as authoritarian and cruel.
The site places significant focus on climate change, civil rights, and social justice issues. In one article, “Project 2025 Is Bad for Everything but Would Accelerate Climate Disaster for Florida”, Factkeepers warns of catastrophic environmental consequences tied to conservative policy proposals. Similarly, in “Far-Right Politicians Are Using the Nazi Playbook Against LGBTQ+ People”, the site draws direct historical comparisons between current right-wing figures and Nazi-era tactics, signaling a deeply adversarial framing of modern conservatism.
While many articles cite credible sources such as major media outlets and scientific organizations, the site’s reporting often blends fact-based information with strong advocacy and editorial opinion. Factkeepers positions itself more as a progressive watchdog and commentary platform than as a traditional balanced news source. Its strong ideological tone, absence of counterpoints, and advocacy journalism lower its neutrality despite generally reliable sourcing practices.
Failed Fact Checks
- There are no known failed fact checks directly involving Factkeepers at this time. However, the heavy editorialization of their articles may make some claims difficult to verify objectively.
Overall, we rate Factkeepers as Left Biased due to its consistent advocacy for progressive policies, strong opposition to conservative figures, and emotionally charged editorial content. We rate them Mostly Factual because, while they generally source information reliably, their strong editorial tone, lack of opposing viewpoints, and frequent blending of commentary with reporting reduce overall neutrality. Factkeepers primarily functions as a progressive commentary and watchdog platform. (D. Van Zandt 04/25/2025)
Source: https://factkeepers.com/
Last Updated on April 26, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources