Endless Urgency (Mike Nellis) – Bias and Credibility

Endless Urgency (Mike Nellis) - Left Bias - Progressive - Socialist - Medium CredibilityFactual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate Endless Urgency Left Biased due to its explicit Democratic alignment, adversarial framing of Republicans, and use of emotionally charged rhetoric. We rate it Mostly Factual for reporting because while it discusses real political events, it is primarily opinion-driven commentary with limited sourcing and strong ideological framing.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.4)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.6)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Endless Urgency is a Substack-based political commentary publication founded by Democratic strategist Mike Nellis. According to its About page, Nellis served as a Senior Advisor to Vice President Kamala Harris prior to her vice presidency and has worked with prominent Democratic candidates. The publication positions itself as “unfiltered” political analysis focused on reforming the Democratic Party, combating Trumpism, and confronting media failures.

Nellis is also profiled by the Shorty Awards, which details his Democratic political consulting and fundraising background in his professional biography.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Endless Urgency is owned and operated by Mike Nellis and distributed via Substack. Revenue is generated through paid subscriptions (approximately $8 per month), podcast monetization, and related media ventures. The publication openly promotes subscriber support as its primary funding model.

Analysis / Bias

Endless Urgency is an openly partisan Democratic opinion platform. It frequently uses emotionally charged language, profanity, and adversarial framing toward Republicans and  Donald Trump.



For example, in Let’s Vent Together About Pam Bondi’s Jackassery, Howard Lutnick’s Lies, and Trump’s Epstein Cover-Up, the headline itself includes derogatory language and presumes wrongdoing. Similarly, BREAKING: Republicans Scramble to Defend Trump’s Racist AI Meme frames Republican reactions in accusatory terms while referencing fascism and Nazism in a persuasive context.

In The Real Sanctuary City Is Washington, D.C., the author employs highly inflammatory rhetoric, alleging systemic corruption tied to Epstein-related claims and accusing both Republican and Democratic administrations of failure, though Republicans are the primary target of criticism.

While the outlet sometimes acknowledges bipartisan institutional failures, its tone is consistently combative and ideologically aligned with progressive Democratic activism. Articles rely largely on commentary, opinion, and interpretation rather than primary investigative reporting. Strong language and moral framing dominate over neutral presentation.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Endless Urgency Left Biased due to its explicit Democratic alignment, adversarial framing of Republicans, and use of emotionally charged rhetoric. We rate it Mostly Factual for reporting because while it discusses real political events, it is primarily opinion-driven commentary with limited sourcing and strong ideological framing. (D. Van Zandt 02/18/2026)

Source: https://endlessurgency.com/

Last Updated on February 18, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: