Daily Grail

Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.



Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Australia
World Press Freedom Rank: Australia 19/180


The Daily Grail is the blog of Greg Taylor from Queensland, Australia that reports on science, conspiracies and pseudoscience, such as the afterlife. Taylor is the author of the book Stop Worrying! There Probably is an Afterlife. The website does not have an about page or any type of disclaimer indicating that some of the information is false or may be misleading. According to Whois the domain was purchased in 1999.

Funded by / Ownership

The Daily Grail is owned by Greg Taylor and is funded through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the Daily Grail reports on a wide variety of science as well as pseudoscience. Interestingly, they also properly debunk conspiracies and at the same time promote some. One of the primary themes of this website is the existence of an afterlife, which at this point there is zero evidence to support. The Daily Grail also likes to refer to skeptics such as James Randi as Guerrilla Skeptics, due to their aggressive nature in debunking false claims and conspiracies, such as the paranormal. What makes the Daily Grail deceiving is they publish many well sourced pro-science articles, yet in between these, are numerous articles referencing the existence of an afterlife, potential alien visitations and the paranormal.

Overall, this is a moderate Conspiracy and Pseudoscience website. (D. Van Zandt 10/31/2018)


Conspiracy Level: Daily Grail
Pseudoscience Level: Daily Grail




We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.

Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC