LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Context as Left-Center Biased due to its emphasis on progressive issues such as climate justice, socioeconomic inclusion, and sustainable development. We rate its reporting as Highly Factual based on its consistent reliance on credible and authoritative sources and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.8)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Context is a global news platform established in September 2022 by the Thomson Reuters Foundation. It builds on the Foundation’s two-decade history of reporting on human rights, climate change, and the socioeconomic impact of technology. Context focuses on three interconnected themes: climate change, inclusive economies, and technology’s role in shaping society. The platform’s mission is to inform and inspire action by highlighting human-centered stories, particularly those addressing inequality and sustainability. It aims to serve policymakers, business leaders, and individuals seeking solutions to global challenges.
Read our profile on UK media and Government.
Funded by / Ownership
Context is operated by the Thomson Reuters Foundation, an independent charity affiliated with Thomson Reuters, a global media and information services company. As a registered charity in both the UK and the USA, the Foundation claims editorial independence, and Context generates revenue through philanthropic support and grants rather than advertisements.
Analysis / Bias
Context regularly emphasizes progressive themes, including Climate, Inclusive Economies, and Gender Equity. For instance, the article “What are puberty blockers and how are they used in trans care?” discusses the UK’s ban on puberty blockers, referencing credible sources like the British Medical Association, Mayo Clinic, and Gov.uk. Additionally, the article includes scientific studies that outline potential risks and uncertainties, as well as the restrictions imposed in various European countries. The piece provides information from multiple perspectives, including criticism of the bans by trans rights advocates and the BMA; its tone subtly emphasizes support for the availability of puberty blockers, aligning with the platform’s progressive editorial stance.
In its political coverage, Context addresses key issues in U.S. elections through a progressive lens. For example, the article “US Elections 2024: Trump’s Journey to the White House” critiques former President Donald Trump’s policies on immigration and reproductive rights. It highlights his “dark rhetoric” and alleged lack of evidence behind claims regarding crime and illegal immigration. The platform also features pieces analyzing how a Trump presidency may affect climate policies, LGBTQ+ rights, and abortion access, such as “Donald Trump is president. What does it mean for climate change?”.
The site typically relies on reputable sources, including Reuters, the European Commission, and Bloomberg. While sourcing is robust, Context often frames narratives to align with its progressive mission, emphasizing positive social justice and sustainability developments while critiquing conservative policies and figures. This positions the platform within a left-center ideological spectrum, though its consistent reliance on credible sources ensures factual reliability.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Context as Left-Center Biased due to its emphasis on progressive issues such as climate justice, socioeconomic inclusion, and sustainable development. We rate its reporting as Highly Factual based on its consistent reliance on credible and authoritative sources and a clean fact-check record. (M. Huitsing 12/17/2024)
Source: https://www.context.news/
Last Updated on December 17, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources