LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate The Constitutional Accountability Center as Left-Center Biased due to its focus on progressive constitutional interpretations. We rate its reporting as High in factuality due to its reliance on legal scholarship, historical constitutional analysis, and judicial engagement.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) is a non-profit law firm and think tank dedicated to advancing the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution based on its text, history, and values. Founded in 2008 by Doug Kendall, CAC works through litigation, policy advocacy, and legal scholarship to ensure that constitutional principles reflect justice, equality, and democracy. The organization emphasizes that the Constitution has evolved through amendments to become more inclusive and equitable. Elizabeth B. Wydra is the organization’s current President. CAC is based in Washington, D.C.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
CAC is a 501(c)(3) non-profit funded through donations and grants. Charity Navigator rates CAC as a Four-Star Charity with a 97% rating for accountability and finance. CAC does not disclose its financial statements online.
Analysis / Bias
The CAC advances progressive legal interpretations on voting rights, environmental protections, and social justice, often filing amicus briefs supporting expanded civil and regulatory protections.
For example, in Pacito v. Trump, CAC challenged policies restricting immigration, arguing that the administration’s actions violated constitutional principles of due process and equal protection. This aligns with its broader stance regarding immigration rights and opposition to restrictive border policies. Additionally, in its analysis of Birthright Citizenship 101, CAC strongly defends the constitutional right to birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, opposing conservative arguments that seek to limit this provision. These cases exemplify CAC’s approach of using constitutional text and history to support progressive legal interpretations.
Although the organization provides well-researched legal analysis, its perspective consistently aligns with progressive judicial principles. Regarding sourcing CAC cites historical constitutional texts and Supreme Court precedents but selectively frames arguments to support progressive interpretations. Its coverage of constitutional issues often critiques conservative judicial decisions while supporting progressive legal theories.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate The Constitutional Accountability Center as Left-Center Biased due to its focus on progressive constitutional interpretations. We rate its reporting as High in factuality due to its reliance on legal scholarship, historical constitutional analysis, and judicial engagement. (M. Huitsing 03/15/2025)
Source: https://www.theusconstitution.org/
Last Updated on March 15, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources