Bastille Post is rated Left-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Bastille Post Left-Center Biased based on economic positions favoring government involvement and state-directed development. More significantly, the outlet demonstrates a strong Pro-Beijing/Pro-Hong Kong Government editorial bias through story selection, framing, and reliance on official sources. We rate it Mostly Factual due to generally verifiable reporting and a clean fact-check record, while deducting for one-sided political coverage, inconsistent independent sourcing, and limited presentation of opposing viewpoints.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.5)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.0)
Country: Hong Kong
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: LIMITED FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Bastille Post (巴士的報) is a Hong Kong-based online newspaper founded in 2013. It publishes local, Chinese, and international news along with business, technology, entertainment, and political commentary. According to its About page, the outlet was created as a digital-first alternative to traditional newspapers and combines original reporting, news curation, analysis, and outside bloggers. Bastille Post Company Limited is headquartered in Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Read our profile on Hong Kong media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Bastille Post was founded by Hong Kong media executive Lo Wing Hung. Corporate filings show that Lo, through Bastille Post Holdings Limited, historically owned 70% of Bastille Post Company Limited, while Sing Tao News Corporation held the remaining 30%. Sing Tao corporate records document this arrangement. Sing Tao later disposed of its interest, leaving Lo as the controlling owner. Revenue is derived primarily from advertising and commercial media activities.
Analysis / Bias
Bastille Post publishes a mixture of conventional news reporting and strongly opinionated commentary. Its most notable political characteristic is a consistent pro-Beijing and pro-Hong Kong government orientation, particularly on national security, China-U.S. relations, and criticism of the Chinese government.
For example, HKSAR Government Strongly Condemns Washington Post Editorial extensively repeats the Hong Kong government’s accusation that criticism of national security legislation is “anti-China” and based on double standards. Similarly, Striking Back Hard Against the US, China Announces 5 Countermeasures presents Chinese retaliation against U.S. policies favorably while characterizing American actions as hostile and petty.
Bastille Post generally identifies its sources, including government agencies, officials, wire services, and other media outlets. However, politically sensitive coverage frequently relies heavily on Chinese or Hong Kong government statements while providing limited competing viewpoints or independent analysis. Commentary is usually identifiable as opinion, which helps distinguish advocacy from straight news.
On a traditional left-right scale, Bastille Post falls closer to Left-Center due to its favorable treatment of state involvement in the economy and China’s state-directed development model. However, this classification does not fully capture the outlet’s ideology, as its strongest bias is toward the Chinese central government and Hong Kong authorities rather than Western-style partisan politics.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate Bastille Post Left-Center Biased based on economic positions favoring government involvement and state-directed development. More significantly, the outlet demonstrates a strong Pro-Beijing/Pro-Hong Kong Government editorial bias through story selection, framing, and reliance on official sources. We rate it Mostly Factual due to generally verifiable reporting and a clean fact-check record, while deducting for one-sided political coverage, inconsistent independent sourcing, and limited presentation of opposing viewpoints. (D. Van Zandt 09/20/2026)
Source: https://www.bastillepost.com/
Last Updated on September 20, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

