LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Actually Relevant as Left-Center Biased based on its progressive-leaning source selection and issue framing. We rate its Factual Reporting as Mostly Factual due to reliance on generally credible third-party sources, high transparency, and no known failed fact checks, though AI-generated summaries may introduce occasional contextual inaccuracies.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.2)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.6)
Country: India
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Actually Relevant is an AI-driven news aggregation project founded by Odin Mühlenbein, co-founder of the AI Lab at Ashoka. According to its About page, it is a side project rather than a formal media company and is not backed by investors. The platform curates stories it deems important to humanity’s long-term future across four issue areas: Human Development, Planet & Climate, Existential Threats, and Science & Technology. All summaries, relevance ratings, and analyses are AI-generated and clearly labeled as such. The site outlines its selection criteria in detail on its Methodology page. They are based in India.
Read our profile on the Indian media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The site is owned and operated by Odin Mühlenbein. It states that it is not a startup, not investor-backed, and operates independently. It claims no ads, no tracking, and no data selling. No corporate ownership or institutional funding is disclosed beyond the founder’s stewardship.
Analysis / Bias
Actually Relevant is an AI-curated aggregator drawing from 79 preselected publications. Its source pool includes outlets such as Al Jazeera, The Guardian, Human Rights Watch, DeSmog, and Oxfam, many of which are commonly rated Left or Left-Center. No clearly right-leaning outlets are listed, resulting in an ideologically imbalanced source base.
A sample story, “Meta, YouTube face US trials over youth harm”, summarizes litigation against social media companies and includes interpretive AI-generated sections such as “Why This Matters.” The framing emphasizes corporate profit motives and regulatory accountability without presenting counterbalancing conservative or free-market perspectives within the summary itself. While the site links directly to original reporting and does not conduct original journalism, its story selection and issue framing consistently prioritize progressive policy themes such as regulation, climate action, and social accountability. This results in a Left-Center bias.
Failed Fact Checks
- No failed fact checks were identified. As an aggregator, factual accuracy depends largely on the credibility of its listed sources. However, AI-generated summaries introduce some risk of interpretive or contextual error.
Overall, we rate Actually Relevant as Left-Center Biased based on its progressive-leaning source selection and issue framing. We rate its Factual Reporting as Mostly Factual due to reliance on generally credible third-party sources, high transparency, and no known failed fact checks, though AI-generated summaries may introduce occasional contextual inaccuracies. (D. Van Zandt 02/22/2026)
Source: https://actuallyrelevant.news/
Last Updated on February 22, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources